LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  March 2015

BIBFRAME March 2015

Subject:

Re: Linked data

From:

Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:46:44 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

Money is the elephant in the room, and lack thereof may be influenced by 
computing and the internet, but libraries struggled mightily before 
that, so it's best not to trot out that old excuse. I mean, go back and 
read the records of the meetings at the British Museum around 1840 in 
which Panizzi had to go through hoops to get funding to create anything 
other than the cheapest, least helpful library catalog for the collection.

We do need to look rationally at the money issue. What holds us back 
greatly -- our fundamental inability to change -- is money-related. 
Where the money is stuck is in library systems. Systems vendors cannot 
afford to re-tool unless libraries can afford to pay for it. Libraries 
cannot afford to pay for it. We need to start from there and look for 
things that we CAN do. This is where OCLC's foray into schema.org 
becomes interesting, and could be a model even for transitioning to 
BIBFRAME. (And it is possible that LibHub is also viable, but I cannot 
find any description of what it is.) By starting with a technology that 
only requires changes to display, not the entire backend of processing, 
we move one tiny step forward. That doesn't mean we never give up MARC 
-- it has too many limitations for us to cling to it for much longer -- 
but it buys us time and gives us a chance to make plans for a transition.

"Just say no" is no more viable today than when Nancy Reagan spouted it 
at sneering teenagers decades ago.

kc

On 3/6/15 10:06 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Ross said:
>
>> Almost as if you had a vested interest in the status quo or
>> something...
> All of our clients have a *large* vested interest in MARC,  Their
> operations (acquisitions, processing, OPAC, circulation), use MARC
> based systems.
>
> In the present financial climate, I doubt they can afford to switch to
> anything else.  I suspect that if Bibframe happens, a niche market for
> us will be producing MARC records from Bibframe data, just as we now
> produce AACR2 and UKMARC compatible records from RDA and MARC21
> records.  Many are not willing to give up GMDs for example.
>
> For some clients we have had to take away bells and whistles (such as
> 505 contents and 520 summaries), because they could no longer afford
> them.  (Many of our clients are special libraries whose acquisitions
> are not nearly all catalogued by national libraries, requiring
> original cataloguing on our part.)
>
> Unfortunately many administrators think that with the Internet,
> libraries are no longer vital, so are unwilling to provide adequate
> funding.
>
> So you are correct, I have a vested interest.
>
> Sorry you thought I was condescending.  We have experience with poor
> communication between librarians and IT folk.  UTLAS' first microfiche
> catalogues for example, had no title main entries, because the
> librarians told the programmers that 245 1st indicator 1 meant a title
> entry.  Title main entries of course have 1st indicator 0, and were
> thus omitted.
>
> When UTLAS ceased, we took product production inhouse.  My sons (SLC's
> IT) and I occasionally failed/fail to understand each other fully.
>
>
>
>     __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
>    {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
>    ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________

-- 
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: +1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager