"I've attended three consecutive RSDs, but I'm not sure I'll participate
in RSD this year. The manufactured exclusivity of the often overpriced
records and their unequal distribution/availability are problematic."
I'm in complete agreement with that.
The other thing I'll add is, my tastes run distinctly modern, and I have a
hard time paying money for releases on vinyl when the odds that it was
24-bit LPCM at some point are quite high (even for remasters, etc.).
Especially when I know the albums might wind up on high-resolution internet
stores a few months later.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Aaron Levinson <[log in to unmask]>
> I found the article both right and wrong in approximately equal measure. I
> like the fact that my many friends who or work at these stores have a
> Christmas in July moment but I dislike the often superfluous things that
> are sometimes put out. His blanket contention that virtually any/all
> unsold RSD releases hemorrhage in value every subsequent day is untrue.
> Some will and some most certainly will not.
> Is it a marketing driven strategy?
> Of course, but that doesn't make it bad...
> Sent from my iPhone
> > On Apr 14, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Eric Cartier <[log in to unmask]>
> > Hi all,
> > The eighth annual Record Store Day (RSD) is set for this Saturday, and
> > Harvey, Pitchfork contributor/Assistant Professor of Communication at
> > State University, wrote an interesting article about RSD:
> > I regularly visit record stores to look for and buy used vinyl, I
> > occasionally purchase select new releases with accompanying download
> > and I've attended three consecutive RSDs, but I'm not sure I'll
> > in RSD this year. The manufactured exclusivity of the often overpriced
> > records and their unequal distribution/availability are problematic.
> > What do you all think about this recorded sound holiday?
> > Sincerely,
> > Eric Cartier
> > Digital Librarian
> > University of Maryland Libraries