On 4/27/2015 6:14 PM, Richard L. Hess wrote:
>
> Of course 96 is also good for accurately reproducing the scratches to
> make removal easier.

Unless you're using the descratching algorithm in DC-EIGHT or its
predecessors, which for some unaccountable reason is optimized for
44.1kHz to the extent that it basically doesn't work at higher sample
rates.

I usually work at 44.1kHz, so I don't have a problem with this, but I
really don't like the limitation.

And yes, it's vital to work at 24-bit resolution; speed changes and EQ
work a helluva lot better on 24-bit files, and so (in my experience)
does descratching.

Peace,
Paul

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com