LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2015

ARSCLIST April 2015

Subject:

Re: speaking of pitch

From:

John Haley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:26:44 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (48 lines)

None of this is surprising.  The level of carelessness with such "givens"
as pitch issues by the major companies that own classic recordings is
legendary.  The more famous the performers, the more careless the handling
of the material seems to be, because they know it will sell anyway.
Sometimes it is like nobody is even listening to what they are putting
out.  The pitch error on the Szell/Oistrakh Brahms VC is unforgiveable and
really not worthy of further "analysis."  The excuses proffered by EMI
people are not worth even reading about.  A screw-up is a screw-up, and it
all stops right there.

Best,
John Haley





On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> http://www.stereophile.com/content/fifth-element-89
>
> This is a good telling of John Marks' tortured journey on discovering a
> seemingly small but very audible pitch error.
>
> I did some further reporting with people I know who are very familiar with
> the EMI classical library. Apparently, the fast-pitched tape from which all
> digital media have been mastered came from Capitol USA, and no one can
> locate the original 2-track master tape made by Carson Taylor, from which
> the first edition USA albums were mastered.
>
> Now, after all of this consternation, it seems to me that one could do as
> I did -- own the HDTracks 96/24 download and then simply apply
> pitch-correction software to it. I couldn't hear any audible degradation
> after doing that and, in fact, it sounded better because it turns out that
> once it's in A=440 (to which Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra strictly
> tuned), the music relaxes and flows better, just from that very slight
> slow-down in tempo.
>
> My personal opinion is that John Marks' dream of remastering this
> recording from the 4-channel Dynatrack tapes will never happen, but I do
> hope that Carson Taylor's original 2-track master (ie a second-generation
> tape, made directly from the Dyntrack session tapes) will be found and this
> pitch error then corrected in all current in-print media.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager