LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2015

ARSCLIST April 2015

Subject:

Re: A-440, was speaking of pitch

From:

Brandon Michael Fess <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:05:00 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (210 lines)

Carl:

I'm pretty sure we've met before - did you have a shop called East End Audio at one point?

Brandon Fess
LIS Candidate, Class of 2015
Graduate Assistant, Belfer Audio Archive

________________________________________
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 5:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] A-440, was speaking of pitch

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad



Hello,

sometimes record companies spare no expense to satisfy their artistes. When I
was engaged by Decca to go to Italy in 1994 and -95 to record Luciano
Pavarotti by the acoustic process on disc, the Steinway Grand rented for the
purpose was tuned down to A-435 (from A-442, I measured) because that is what
Pavarotti wanted. It was a process that lasted 4 hours, the Steinway
techician muttering "poor Steinway" all awhile. I would expect Decca to have
paid for raising it again subsequently. However, Leone Magiera, Pavarotti's
accompanist, did not mind the lower pitch and treated us to some beautiful
Liszt.

Pavarotti wanted to determine if he was a better tenor than Caruso, and since
Caruso had unfortunately died, they needed to compete on recordings. And
perhaps he did not trust the AICC cylinders, where the choice of recording
experts would have been greater. Important for the present discussion is that
he believed that Caruso had sung at A-435.

Now, if they ever want to issue those recordings they will have to take the
pitch into account, unless they merely take the digital tapes as they find
them. I have the pitch in my metadata, but do they?

By contract I am not at liberty to give detailed information.

I was present in London at the recent re-enactment of the famous 1913
recording of Beethoven's 5th by Arthur Nikisch. The conductor, Robin O'Neill,
did not want to tune down (for some instruments it would have been
impossible; they would have had to use old woodwinds and gut strings), and he
did not want to interpret the symphony the way Nikisch had done. He created a
very energetic performance and was a huge inspiration to his students'
orchestra, the Royal College of Music Chamber Orchestra. This does come
through on the result of the acoustic recording.

Best wishes,


George

--------------------------------------------

Tom Fine wrote:

> Part of John Marks' research into that article included contacting the
> Cleveland Orchestra's music
> librarian and archivist. Not surprising to those familiar with George
> Szell's music and biography,
> he was an absolute stickler for consistent tuning to A=440.
>
> The bigger issue I was surprised and somewhat dismayed to learn details of
> is EMI's practice of
> using 3rd generation dub tapes as their master of record for almost
> everything recorded by Carson
> Taylor in the U.S. That got me acquiring some copies of the original LPs and
> I was shocked to hear
> how much better many of them sound, even compared to late 90s "Recordings of
> the Century" remasters
> by Abbey Road. It goes to show that even if you have a good playback and a
> good digital chain, with
> skilled engineering, if you have a several-generations dub tape there's only
> so much fidelity you
> can get out of it. Plangent would help, but it's still better to get as
> close to first generation as
> is practical, particularly with classical music (because the dynamics, pitch
> and instrument tones
> are so effected by the slightest aspects of output<>input inherent to all
> tape dubs).
>
> According to what I learned from talking to people with knowledge of EMI
> Classics' practices (still
> in effect with Warner Classics), using the 3rd generation tapes is the path
> of least resistence
> because Capitol had some way to keep what were Angel master tapes in the US
> and only send out dubs
> for UK pressing. Apparently in the cases when a UK crew came over here and
> made recordings (standard
> practice after about 1980), then the master tapes were retained in England.
> In those cases, if the
> Angel LP was cut at Capitol, it was likely cut from a dub tape, so the UK
> EMI LP is likely to sound
> better. Taking it back to the modern era, I still can't get a definitive
> answer if the Capitol-made
> EMI classical recordings' tapes are in a vault here, and if they'll ever be
> used to make a new
> series of remasters.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Smolian" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 8:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] A-440, was speaking of pitch
>
>
> >I can't find the references at the moment, but I gave a paper at a long-ago
> ARSC about this issue.
> >I'm depending on memory for the dates, but it'll be pretty close.
> >
> > The U.S. Navy adopted A-440 in 1916. The National Bureau Standards did so
> in or about 1918.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the bands of most or all U.S. Armed Service bands
> that were in training and
> > later participated in WW I were equipped with A-440 instruments.
> >
> > It is my speculation that many older instruments were given by masters to
> servants or found their
> > way into hock shops, which thus made such instruments available to poorer
> musicians. I've not
> > seen any writing about this issue during the formative jazz band years.
> Those more versed in the
> > reminiscences of the early layers may have encountered comments about
> adjusting or not adjusting
> > tunable instruments and, where impractical, living with the sound.
> >
> > In the early 1960s I contacted a piano tuner through Steinway, a fellow
> whose responsibilities
> > included the instruments used by Victor during Caruso's day. He told me
> that they always tuned
> > tuned to A= 440. I believe I included this somewhere in one of my
> American Record Guide columns
> > then as a result.
> >
> > Each orchestra has a collection of tuning forks, or, at least, used to,
> and their period of use
> > is often documented.
> >
> > As to older situations, read "The Story of A" by - can't recall his name.
> It carefully explain s
> > and documents pitch issues over the centuries when a court in Germany
> hired an Italian or French
> > court composer who then had instruments made for use during his tenure.
> It also talks about the
> > issues of different pitches for instrumental and instruments with vocal
> music and organ keyboards
> > that played in either of two pitches, depending on the type of service.
> >
> > Pitch is also affected by temperature. The way concert halls are and were
> heated had a direct
> > effect as well.
> >
> > It's really complicated and fascinating.
> >
> >
> > Steve Smolian
> >
> > Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Fine
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:12 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [ARSCLIST] speaking of pitch
> >
> > http://www.stereophile.com/content/fifth-element-89
> >
> > This is a good telling of John Marks' tortured journey on discovering a
> seemingly small but very
> > audible pitch error.
> >
> > I did some further reporting with people I know who are very familiar with
> the EMI classical
> > library. Apparently, the fast-pitched tape from which all digital media
> have been mastered came
> > from
> > Capitol USA, and no one can locate the original 2-track master tape made
> by Carson Taylor, from
> > which the first edition USA albums were mastered.
> >
> > Now, after all of this consternation, it seems to me that one could do as
> I did -- own the
> > HDTracks
> > 96/24 download and then simply apply pitch-correction software to it. I
> couldn't hear any audible
> > degradation after doing that and, in fact, it sounded better because it
> turns out that once it's
> > in
> > A=440 (to which Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra strictly tuned), the
> music relaxes and flows
> > better, just from that very slight slow-down in tempo.
> >
> > My personal opinion is that John Marks' dream of remastering this
> recording from the 4-channel
> > Dynatrack tapes will never happen, but I do hope that Carson Taylor's
> original 2-track master (ie
> > a
> > second-generation tape, made directly from the Dyntrack session tapes)
> will be found and this
> > pitch
> > error then corrected in all current in-print media.
> >
> > -- Tom Fine
> >

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager