LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2015

ARSCLIST April 2015

Subject:

Re: SACD "surprise"

From:

Carl Pultz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Apr 2015 17:29:07 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

Not near-field; a little more distance is needed for the drivers to integrate. I mix in the box, so there's no console in the way - it's an audiophile setup. The woofers are 6" so certainly not full-range. But they have tremendous excursion and speed, with low distortion. The designer got a balance of port tuning and baffle-step eq that is satisfying in my smallish 12x26 room. 2' from the wall, they're 7' apart and I sit around 8' away. They're perched on Sound Anchor stands that are as heavy as the speakers, a solid foundation that helps both bass and imaging. Wood floor, plaster walls. I find it satisfying, even for reggae dub and techno, up to about 95dB. I use headphones and spectral displays to check below 30 Hz. Back when I had Dunlavy SC-4s in the room the bass extension was a problem of too much. I'd need a different space to go full-range, and/or very carefully tuned subs and traps.

It was very to get the cone to match the speed of the ribbon tweeter. It works. I haven't heard his new models, which use Accuton tweeters. They may be easier to implement and cheaper than the RAALs. The cabinets are very impressive - heavy, solid, and dead. Considering the cost of parts, the prices are quite reasonable. He demos by appointment.

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] SACD "surprise"

Hi Carl:

Are you using those speakers near-field or on stands somewhat apart and ahead of your listening position? I'm wondering how the tweeter and woofer balance out and if they are suitable for near-field monitoring (about a 6-foot triangle)? Also, what is the woofer size? It looks tiny. Do these things really move bass air? How? Not saying it's not possible, just wondering how they do it.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] SACD "surprise"


> Sure, I'll try to be descriptive without getting too poetically subjective. First it took 'clean'
> to a new level in my experience. It holds on to high-level signals so that there is less loss of
> articulation on complex signals than I was used to hearing, and usually blamed on my speakers.
> There is also no audible fizz or low-level distortion to modulate the music, which allows more
> sonic texture to emerge and seems to preserve more timbrel (word invention?!) color. This is
> reminiscent of a tube amp in clarity and lack of grain, but a quality that is preserved at a much
> wider range of power than is typical with a 40 - 60 watt tube amp. In fact the Benchmark has a
> consistency of tonal balance and character across the range of pitches and dynamics that is better
> than anything else I've owned. The impression of openness and clarity at very low volume is
> exceptional. The two channels must track each other very closely because imaging, particularly
> center placement, is unambiguous. As good as some other visitors to my house have been, Bryston
> 4bst, Parasound 21, Odyssye Stratos, Sim Moon, my rebuilt Dynaco Mk. IIIs, or Coda and Krell and
> ARC in my past, the Benchmark is a combo of all their strengths and none of their downsides.
>
> I am annoyed by minor details. Apparently EU mandate requires a timeout. If there's no audio after
> 30 minutes, the thing shuts off. It's surprising how many times it happens when I'm moving between
> tasks. The remote trigger thing is weirdly useless in its interface with the DAC. The binding
> posts require narrow spade lugs and flexible wire, or else banana terminals. Often, when switched
> on, the protection kicks in for no reason, so an off/on cycle is needed to start it up. It sounded
> bright and weird at first, so I used cables similar to what Benchmark sells - Canare mic cable and
> a Belden twisted quad. After 30 hours or so, the sound smoothed out and better wire could be used.
> I've settled on the Swedish-made Supra quad speaker and balanced interconnect for now. Madisound
> sells it - good value. That wire was too bright in context with the brasher treble of the DAC1.
> With the smoother character of the DAC2, it works nicely. My speakers are small-batch two-way
> monitors, using RAAL ribbon tweeters and Accuton ceramic woofers. Quite revealing.
> http://www.clearwavespeakers.com/webapps/p/98515/300200/723936 Because the whole thing is so
> quiet, I expect it would work well with high-sensitivity Klipsch and Altecs, etc. Power is not
> limitless. For a big room, you'll want two, bridged. So do I, but it would be crazy overkill in my
> modest space. For what it does, I think $3k is reasonable, and for $5k, the dac/amp makes a
> fantastic system.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of L. Hunter Kevil
> Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2015 11:24 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] SACD "surprise"
>
> Hi Carl,
>
> Would you please share more of your thoughts about the new Benchmark power amplifier? It can boast
> of a new technology as well as its high price. TIA,
>
> L. H. Kevil
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Carl Pultz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> BTW, the DAC2 is a substantial improvement on the DAC1, various
>> versions of which I've owned since it came out over ten years ago.
>> Even the analog path is better. Still, I hear a difference with it
>> between Toslink and coax from the same Redbook source. Always have. I
>> know, I know.... The async USB is also audibly better than with the
>> standard driver, whatever the data rate. It was such an impressive upgrade that I splurged on
>> their new amp.
>> It replaces a Bryston, which is no toy. The combo is highly revealing,
>> yet not annoyingly so, as there often is a tradeoff between
>> transparency and musicality. I find it correct for whichever hat I'm
>> wearing, mixer or music-lover.
>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager