LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2015

ARSCLIST April 2015

Subject:

Re: LP and Media Imaging

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Apr 2015 19:31:28 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (83 lines)

Hi Allison:

I work on this kind of thing in the world of commercial releases, specifically modern reissues of 
music recorded and released in the LP era. Here are some partial answers to some of your questions, 
purely based on my own work and experience. So it's just one data-point in your research.

1. from a commercial standpoint, original artwork used in reissue graphics is important because it's 
what buyers want in the product. This was learned in the marketplace in the 1990s. "Authenticity" 
matters in the world of commercial sales. A digital scan is important because it can be used for 
both printed booklets/liner notes and also for online advertising, catalog information or download 
materials for download-only releases.

From a corporate-assets point of view, scans of original album covers are often the only way to 
reproduce the graphic content. In another thread on this list, I cited a fire at a warehouse in the 
early 2000's that destroyed much original artwork for Mercury and other UMG labels. So for instance 
with new remasters of Mercury Living Presence albums, in most cases the best source of "authentic" 
graphics and liner notes is a high-quality scan of the original LP cover. This has actually become 
more important in the age of box sets of CDs in "mini-LP" slip covers.

2. for my purposes, I've had good results and an efficient workflow with an Epson large-format 
scanner. I scan directly into a long-outdated version of Photoshop, usually perform some minor 
contrast and color-balance touchup and then save as "maximum" resolution JPG. I've found that no one 
at the record companies or their graphics production places wants to deal with Photoshop PSD files 
or TIFF lossless files. They'd rather have some minor lossiness and have universal JPG format. This 
might be different in the visual-archives world. I'm sure it's not "best practices", but it's how 
things work in the world of commerce and deadlines.

3. as for storage, I always keep things backed up to at least two different drives. I can't say I'm 
confident material sent over to corporate servers is as well accounted for or maintained, but hope 
springs eternal. I do know I've been asked for the same things again and again in a few cases, so 
files may disappear into data blackholes occasionally. I've always taken the time to keep my image 
files sorted and organized, so I have about 15 years of stuff that has migrated through a few 
computers and hard drives and is still in good working order.

If I were doing a higher volume of digitizing LP covers, I would investigate a copy-stand and DSLR 
camera setup. It's doable, although you need to spend the time and money to get the lighting right, 
which is difficult with glossy covers and also it's something of a challenge to uniformly illuminate 
a 12x12 area and have the camera pick it up as such. Now that I wrote that, I'm happy once again I 
stuck with a flatbed scanner! It may be a little cumbersome to lift the lid and line up the artwork 
so it's square repeatedly, but once the scanning takes place, I always get a highly usable image, 
and the process is repeatable.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allison Bohm" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 1:58 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] LP and Media Imaging


> Hello, I'm currently trying to complete a project regarding the archival
> imaging of audio media, particularly vinyl records/LPs. I was wondering if
> anyone on the listserv is currently undergoing projects to capture images
> of items such as LPs. If so, would you be willing to share why you think
> that this kind of project is important and should be funded and completed?
> Some questions that I am currently trying to gather information for
> include:
>
> Why do you believe these types of projects and initiatives are important?
> How are these projects funded?
> Who completes the work?
> What type of equipment is used, and why?
> How and where are the images stored?
>
> Any insight or comments would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to respond
> off-list as well, although it isn't necessary.
>
> Thank you!
>
> -- 
> Allison Bohm
> Indiana University
> MLS
> ​ Student> 
> ;
> ​Music Librarianship Specialization, Archives and Records Management
> Specialization
> MDPI SMARTeam Member
> LAMC Technical Services Assistant
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager