LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  April 2015

ARSCLIST April 2015

Subject:

Re: "Best of both worlds" disk preamplifier

From:

John Haley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 18 Apr 2015 03:42:02 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

I looked the link for the EMT JPA 66 and I see that it is a tube preamp
unit, which basically eliminates it from serious consideration for
restoration work, whatever the price tag.  When we are capturing audio at
96/24 these days, we want to catch all the transient response we can, and
we don't want tube equipment slowing that down and mucking it up.  If
people like the "euphonious" sound of tubes, that's fine, enjoy it, but in
my view it's not really appropriate for serious restoration work.  The
tubes are actually adding a kind of distortion that some people like, a
kind of sonic haze, but that's counterproductive when you are trying to get
the truest, clearest, best sound possible out of old sources.  It's just a
fact that tubes simply can't move at the same speed as transistors.

I Googled the Timestep T01EQ and all that came up was running shoes.  Does
anyone have the link for that?

Best,
John Haley


On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Corey Bailey <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> Excellent suggestion!
>
> I would add the Timestep T01EQ to that list (and any other commercially
> available unit made since the last review). The unit was mentioned by Dave
> Cawley in a previous post. I checked out the link he posted and it looks
> very interesting. I would also be happy to throw my hat in the ring as one
> of the reviewers. I have the test gear and know how to use it.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Corey
> Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
> www.baileyzone.net
>
> On 4/17/2015 5:15 AM, Tom Fine wrote:
>
>> That's another preamp that should be in an ARSC "bake-off" panel article
>> in the ARSCJ! This would be a great update to old ARSCJ articles about
>> now-defunct devices like the OWL.
>>
>> At about US$6770, Ted's Mousetrap is on the high end of pricing, below
>> the LOC Preamp but above other competitors mentioned so far.
>>
>> Having done some equipment reviewing, I think this bakeoff is feasible,
>> perhaps something to propose to the new ARSCJ editor when they get up to
>> speed. Each company would be invited to submit a unit for review. The units
>> would circulate among review-panel members, perhaps a month loan at a time.
>> As always, the reviewers would need to be responsible for proper packing
>> and shipping, and not breaking the units. Perhaps there would be some ARSC
>> grant money to cover the shipping among reviewers? One reviewer should
>> subject the units to a series of tests against published specs and other
>> such things (hopefully this will be of interest to Gary Galo, because he's
>> set up to do this sort of thing). Using the units on actual working
>> projects would be great, but it's also completely OK to use a set of known
>> discs and compare results. The panelists should make audio files to
>> illustrate examples they discuss in their reviews.
>>
>> This would be a great service to ARSC members and the disk-transfer
>> community in general. Take a scientific approach, including rigorous
>> testing, but also have first-hand accounts from disk-transfer experts on
>> how these things actually perform on the firing line.
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Hallifax" <
>> [log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 6:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] "Best of both worlds" disk preamplifier
>>
>>
>>  I reckon Ted Kendall's Front End pre-amplifier (AKA Mousetrap) fulfils
>>> just
>>> about all the criteria mentioned. It's a beautifully hand-crafted 3u
>>> device
>>> with 2 phono inputs, balanced inputs and outputs pre-, and post-eq. It
>>> also
>>> incorporates Packburn-type noise reduction side chains that are easily be
>>> switched out of circuit. I believe a smaller, stereo version, without the
>>> side chains is under development.
>>> It's well known and used by serious archivists in the UK (EMI sound
>>> archive,
>>> Abbey Rd, CHARM - King's College London, British Library etc).
>>> Personally,
>>> I'm thoroughly convinced of its sonic neutrality, and never hesitate in
>>> recommending it for transfer projects I'm involved with. It's in another
>>> league to much of the competition as one might infer from the hefty
>>> price tag!
>>> More info here http://www.tedkendall.com/mousetrap.php
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager