LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  April 2015

BIBFRAME April 2015

Subject:

Re: URIs in $0 Re: [BIBFRAME] Complexities to code

From:

"Harlow, Christina Marie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 4 Apr 2015 21:00:08 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

I can report that, when we encounter $0 with identifiers, we leave them in (but don’t go on to add them or asked that they be added; this is being discussed due to issue mentioned below). 

Our new ILS includes some out-of-the-box authority jobs that review records each night and links certain (1XX, 6XX, 7XX) headings in new records to appropriate authority records from LCNAF or LCSH, as well as update the headings as the authority headings change. These jobs in our ILS continue to wrongly link FAST headings, with $2 fast and $0 [fast identifier], to LCSH headings. I’ve yet to see that if once wrongly linked, and the LCSH heading changes, then the system will change the FAST heading that it is believe to be LCSH, but in theory this will happen.

I’ve reported the issue to the vendor but have yet to hear back, and these are jobs that we cannot edit - you either turn them on or off, there is no in between. I bring this up as an example of where I hope the vendors are also working on how to best handle identifiers (for these jobs seems to be just checking the text strings without regard to other present information in the field, like identifiers or vocabulary source), while catalogers continue to develop their own workflows and decisions on them. I’d love to start pulling in identifiers for all such headings (as I do in my non-MARC work), but the current system doesn’t seem ready for this, especially if we’d have to repair the authority corrections each day. If I have any developments on this, I’ll be happy to share to the group.

Thanks,
Christina

Christina Harlow
Cataloging & Metadata Librarian
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
---
306Z1 Hodges Library
865-974-0029
[log in to unmask]

> On Apr 4, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> On 4/4/15 12:27 PM, Steven Folsom wrote:
>> Yes, we will be working with MARC for a while longer. I, too, hope in the meantime that we make strides in sanctioned additions and work arounds to MARC that position us for better days, e.g. more $0 URI’s that are dereferenceable.
> Just want to note that some of the same vendors who do authority updates will also add the appropriate URI in the $0 of the returned record. I've been told, however, that this service is not being requested by customers. Getting those $0's filled in would make it possible for all library systems to produce useful schema.org markup in their displays. It would also make any conversion to BIBFRAME or RDA in RDF much more economical because the identifiers would already be available.
> 
> So, is anyone doing this? Getting the $0's filled in? Do you have info to report from your experience?
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> m: +1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager