LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  April 2015

BIBFRAME April 2015

Subject:

Re: Linked data

From:

James Weinheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:41:20 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

On 4/3/2015 1:34 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>> All very nicely done, but as we see, it can be done (is done) with MARCXML and is an example of something that is too difficult for a non-librarian developer to do. After Bibframe, it will be easier for others to take it, if they want it. While I see nothing wrong with this and am all for it, it is also something that libraries could have been working with for a long time, since the beginning of MARCXML. You don't have to have RDF if you know the schema. This illustrates my point.
> It does nothing of the kind. What it illustrates is that as long as Linked Data is limited by construction to what is available in MARC, as you did in your example, it will provide no information that was not originally found in MARC. That is a triviality.
>
> If a Linked Data exposition of bibliography is limited to data that is found in MARC, there will have been little point in producing it. Luckily for our patrons, that will not be anything like the case.

It is difficult to discuss all things in a single posting. In my
previous post (which was long enough), I did not discuss Linked Data,
only MARCXML and Bibframe. Perhaps I should have changed the subject
line. Mea culpa. But this is about linked data.

Of course, if linked data is to work, it needs links. To my knowledge,
there has never been a place in the MARC format for such links (although 
  I may be wrong. If I am right though, it is yet another  reason to 
abandon the convention of "roundtrippability"). Since there is no place 
where the links can be input, there can be nothing to extract. If those 
links did exist in our catalogs, they could be extracted, just like any 
other bit of information.

Since the links do not currently exist, they will have to be added in
some way. This can be done either manually (an appalling idea) or they
must be generated in some way, similar to the example in my previous
post about the generation of the text "parallel" for type of title. That 
will be a major project, but after the links are there, things can at 
least begin to happen.

That still doesn't end it however--as I wrote in the very first post,
there is a rather important question of what do we link *to*? id.loc.gov 
and VIAF are not very exciting for the public. (And I'll confess it: 
they aren't very exciting for me either!) I believe I have seen at least 
some records in VIAF that have links to dbpedia so something more might 
be built through that, but obviously, that will demand a lot of time, 
thought and development.

All of this also assumes the existence of lots of money--something that
most libraries do not have a lot of lying around at the moment. There
are huge problems that need to be resolved.

But that does not mean that we shouldn't begin, because we should begin. 
Better late than never.

To repeat once more: my initial statement was directed toward
catalogers, to tell them why they should not expect anything wonderful
anytime soon after Bibframe is implemented, because in itself, Bibframe
does not give *libraries* (i.e. those who understand the schema) any
more possibilities than they have had for a long time. While MARCXML can 
be a pain to work with, it nevertheless *can* be worked with. In any 
case, for better or worse, it is a tool libraries have had for around 20 
years. In my experience, you build the best you can using the tools that 
you have--not the tools you wish you had.

The way I look at it: if all you have is a horse and buggy, you should
use them in the best ways possible. Maybe it's too bad, but it makes no
sense to just wait at home and do nothing until somebody shows up with a 
Ferrari. You and everyone else could die waiting.

James Weinheimer [log in to unmask]
First Thus http://blog.jweinheimer.net
First Thus Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/FirstThus
Personal Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/james.weinheimer.35
Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JamesWeinheimer
Cooperative Cataloging Rules
http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/
Cataloging Matters Podcasts
http://blog.jweinheimer.net/cataloging-matters-podcasts
The Library Herald http://libnews.jweinheimer.net/

[delay +30 days]

[delay +30 days]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager