I wonít belabor this much further, but can you give a citation other than your assertion that FLAC is an actual audio recording scheme and not just a compression/storage format?
I challenege you to prove a positive, not for me to prove a negative. I frankly donít know enough about it, but do know people I can ask.
On May 18, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Dave Rice <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Intelligent refutation is welcome.
> I can refute, but the information above seems to be based on presumptions (correct me if I'm wrong). If you have a citation that claims that "FLAC is not a recording format", that "FLAC is not a digital encoding format", or that "one must start with WAV (or other PCM format) files in order to get to FLAC" than I am happy to refute.
> Dave Rice