LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2015

ARSCLIST May 2015

Subject:

Re: another file format question

From:

Nigel Champion <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 19 May 2015 21:26:19 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi Steve.

WaveLab 8.5 generates the internal MD5 when it is saving the file not when it is opening it so you can't view it until it has been re-opened.

BWF MetaEdit is a multi-purpose utility that can be used to read and export a huge selection of metadata from the header of a WAV file (or a folder of WAV files if you prefer). The metadata selected in the Option/Preference settings can be exported to a CSV or XML file. You choose between a graphic user interface or a command line one. The GUI allows drag-and-drop for file selection. If you are not asking it to generate the MD5 hash (for insertion or confirmation) in the Option/Preference settings, it will extract the metadata very quickly indeed.

In this context, BWF MetaEdit makes no changes to the file so there's no risk of corruption - a problem we experience with its sister utility AVIMetaEdit!

All the Best
Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Smolian
Sent: Wednesday, 20 May 2015 2:48 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] another file format question

Hi Richard the Ever-Helpful,

When opening the file in Wavelab 8.5 after running the MD% check box option, there are three distinct segments in the RH top panel that shows in bold Metadata, BWG and MD5, with the added or derived components listed under each.

At this point, I copy and paste to a spreadsheet, a time-consuming, laborious process, especially as most of what I'm doing this is for large groups of under-15 minute files. There's GOT to be a better way to find a dedicated utility for this without getting tangled up in larger, more expensive and more "learning required" programs.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard L. Hess
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] another file format question

Hi, Steve,

This is much harder than track formats and balanced audio interconnects <sigh>.

To the best of my knowledge, the only way to put an MD5 checksum (let's call it that or hash if you will) into a Broadcast WAV file is to use BWF MetaEdit which Dave Rice helped create.

It is available here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bwfmetaedit/

I see there has been an update within the last month (I had gotten tired of checking for updates for a while) which is good news and I conditionally retract my comment about it being "buggy" until this version is proven--hopefully it won't be buggy.

I use three applications which can create BWF metadata:
Sound Devices recorder
Samplitude ProX2 Suite
Izotope RX4

All three can make a "created date," but RX re-creates that if working on a file made on the Sound Devices recorder.

The MD5 checksum is NOT part of the BWF unique identifier and recorder information. It is a separate chunk, as far as I can tell, specific to this function.

It may be that Wavelab can write the MD5 checksum chunk into the file.
(The biggest chunk in the WAV file is the actual audio data, what SMPTE calls the "essence" and then there are little chunks for various tags.
Broadcast WAV "bext" chunk is the one with the coding "history" which I use advisedly.)

Wavelab has been embraced by the archival field and may have integraged the MD5 checksum architecture embodied in BWF MetaEdit.

If you created the file in Wavelab and then added the MD5 checksum in Wavelab (assuming it might do that) OR BWF MetaEdit and then processed the file in iZotope RX4 and exported it, retaining the original MD5 checksum would be illogical as the only reason to run RX4 would be to modify the contents of the audio chunk which would then invalidate the
MD5 checksum.

I have abandoned the use of internal MD5 checksums for files and still use FastSum to create external MD5 checksum files which then FastSum can automatically check.

I do not know if the fixity checkers that are available work with MD5 files created by FastSum, but my intent is allow my clients to verify the files after download as I deliver much of my final work product electronically.

Does this help at all to get you over the hump you are experiencing?

Cheers,

Richard



On 2015-05-18 3:45 PM, Steven Smolian wrote:
> Hi, Richard,
>
> This is precisely what I am doing- or think I'm doing, including unchecking the 32 bit box in RX4. . I look at the metadata in Wavelapb 8.5 but see no MD5 number. When I navigate to the check box for same in Waveab, the gear logo remains in the box at the upper left but doesn't turn or indicate it's alive in any way.
>
> I suppose I'm looking for a utility into which I can paste the filename that I want the MD5 number for and it will run the program and fill in the numbers. I would then like to export it to the hard drive on which I have loaded the identical files (I hope), have it calculate those as well and insert them in another column to the right of the first one, all as a plug-in or an integral part of one of these two programs. Is there such an animal?
>
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard L. Hess
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 2:43 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] another file format question
>
> Hi, Steve,
>
> What I was thinking of in iZotope was the Export File dialogue which contains, across the top:
>
> WAV, AIFF, FLAC, OGG
>
> For WAV, the options are:
>
> Bit depth, Dither
>
> (check) BWF (check) Preserve non-audio data
>
> (check) Reopen file in RX OK Cancel
>
> It is the two check boxes below Bit depth and dither:
>
> When exporting from RX, the WAV file is created anew.
>
> With BWF checked, I think that passes through the other BWF data.
>
> With Preserve non-audio data, I think that passes through other data (such as the BWF MetaEdit MD5 checksum and probably the tags that Tom is discussing).
>
> Thanks for asking, Steve. I just posted this to the RX forum:
>
>> I may be confused with this, but if I open a Broadcast Wave file
>> (generated on a Sound Devices 722) in RX4 and then save it with the
>> BWF option checked, it replaces the Sound Devices origination stamp
>> with its own and the current date.
>>
>> I thought that the Origination stamp should not be over-written, but
>> that RX should write into the coding history that it had processed
>> the file.
>>
>> I don't know if this is a bug or not, but it seems not to work the
>> way I thought it should.
>
> I know nothing about WaveLab since 6.1.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 2015-05-18 2:07 PM, Steven Smolian wrote:
>> Hi, Richard,
>>
>> I'm using Izotope- great program.
>>
>> However, I've not tried the MD5 option (nor even looked for it) as
>> Izotope stores everything in 32 bit floating format and I usually
>> convert to 24 bits so I know it plays on other machines. I'm afraid
>> to get it come up with a code with the 32 floating as part of the
>> imbedded code which won't match the 24 bits in which I ultimately
>> save the file. Comments?
>>
>> So I export to Wavelab 8.5 where I add metadata. It shows me the
>> MD5 logo, I hit the checkbox to invoke it, but nothing happens. I'm
>> awaiting an email back from Steinberg about this.
>>
>> Steve
>
--
Richard L. Hess email: [log in to unmask]
Aurora, Ontario, Canada 647 479 2800
http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager