LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2015

ARSCLIST May 2015

Subject:

Re: Not a Frisco site

From:

Dave Radlauer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 23 May 2015 09:08:46 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

Tom --

>> In some ways, but not an exact analog, the so-called "revivalists" were
like punk rockers in the late 70s -- rejecting the current directions their
chosen genre of music had taken and going back to a "simpler" kind of
rhythm and song structure. I put "simpler" in quotes because, as Dave
correctly points out, well-played Dixieland jazz requires superb chops and
rhythm. <<

Yes exactly. See my note to David Lewis, just sent.

I'm just tired of frequently hearing the vintage and revival jazz forms
carelessly disrespected, since that's my wheelhouse. Maybe that's not what
you were saying, but I took it that way. Thanks for taking the time to
look a little deeper.

Revival and preservation of popular music forms isn't new or unusual:
Bluegrass, Blues, Western Swing, Folk, Klezmer, Cajun, and retro-Swing two
decades ago all were all *revival* (for lack of a better term) movements,
rarely successfully commercially exploited, that came from the ground up.

Dave



On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi Dave:
>
> And they are good pages! I still don't get why you took as a personal
> attack my question about why a "revival" was needed when original musicians
> were still around making music. You never did answer that question, but I
> do appreciate your off-list apology and efforts to raise the level of
> discourse on-list. Again, my original post concerned the new Condon/Freeman
> box set, and the accompanying question was not an attack on anyone
> (particularly you) but rather an observation that Condon, Freeman and
> others who actually made records in the real "jazz age" were still
> recording in the late 1940s, so why the need for a "revival"?
>
> Based on the fact-based parts of your posts, and the wealth of fact-based
> information on your website, I think I found part of my answer. What was
> called a "revival" wasn't really that. It was more an extension of the "old
> style" jazz styles into a new generation of musicians. The form had never
> died out, so it wasn't being "revived."
>
> In some ways, but not an exact analog, the so-called "revivalists" were
> like punk rockers in the late 70s -- rejecting the current directions their
> chosen genre of music had taken and going back to a "simpler" kind of
> rhythm and song structure. I put "simpler" in quotes because, as Dave
> correctly points out, well-played Dixieland jazz requires superb chops and
> rhythm.
>
> One other point Dave made is true, and backs up my point about "revival"
> being a wrong term for what happened. The interaction between the young
> guys and the old original musicians, plus Atlantic's and others' recordings
> in New Orleans of real musicians playing in the original ways (and the
> establishment of Preservation Hall), shows again that the old music and
> musicians hadn't died out enough to need a "revival," except maybe on
> swing- and bop-obsessed radio stations on the coasts.
>
> Thinking further on this, I wonder if this idea of a "revival" came partly
> from record collectors, who need a "cause" so they can boast that what they
> have is special and rare. Just before, and at the time, that the first
> young "revival" musicians were getting together, many of the original 78s
> were either being reissued (Avakian at Columbia, among others) or compiled
> into LPs (Keepnews and Grauer for RCA, among others). So there wasn't
> really a "scarcity" of anything but original 1920's pressings of records
> (and also keep in mind that bootleg 78s had proliferated in the 1940s, so
> the old music was readily available and not "extinct" or "dormant" by any
> measure).
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Radlauer" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:10 AM
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Not a Frisco site
>
>
> Incidentally, I would add that while my site may contains much on the Trad
>> revival, that is far from the majority of the content.
>>
>> I do have pages dedicated solely to:
>>
>> Eddie Condon
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/24348.html
>>
>> Teagarden
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/34301.html
>>
>> Muggsy Spanier
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/108201.html
>>
>> Pee Wee Russell
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/206.html
>>
>> NORK
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/41101.html
>>
>> ODJB
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/305.html
>>
>> Buddy Bolden
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/179.html
>>
>> Not to mention great depth and award-winning broadcasts/pages on:
>> James P Johnson
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/24264.html
>>
>> Jelly Roll Morton
>> http://jazzhotbigstep.com/67001.html
>>
>> Basie, Ellington, Casa Loma, Goodman, Artie Shaw, Billie, Bix and Ella.
>> Early jazz violin and guitar.
>> Cheatham, Bechet, Armstongs (Louie AND Lil), Fats Waller, Fatha Hines,
>> Django, Clarence Williams and Women of Jazz
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Dave R
>>
>>
>>


--
hm# 510-848-8323
cell# 510-717-5240
www.JAZZHOTBigstep.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager