LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2015

ARSCLIST May 2015

Subject:

Re: Apology if that was unnecessarily heated

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 23 May 2015 13:07:09 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (123 lines)

I think Aaron makes a really good point. No matter how skilled a musician one may be, it's easier to 
look back than to move things forward. I look at jazz musicians like Charlie Parker, Mingus, Max 
Roach/Clifford Brown/Sonny Rollins, Roland Kirk, and the young Miles Davis -- guys operating in 
various parts of the same time-horizon when many of the young guys' trad jazz bands and recordings 
were happening -- and I see a whole different level of creativity.  It's akin to the difference 
between being a great conductor of Brahms circa 1915 or being Igor Stravinsky or Arnold Schoenberg.

Once again, this isn't to say that the Dixieland "revivalists" didn't make pleasing, fun music 
(which stood in stark, enjoyable contrast to some of the harsh-sounding and hard to follow "modern 
jazz"), or that they weren't good players (in fact the best often exhibited better chops and tighter 
rhythm than the more drug-addled modern jazz heroes). It is saying, in agreement with Aaron, that 
their importance to jazz and moving jazz forward shouldn't be overstated. Alas, what we have today 
in jazz is a two-pronged "revival" -- some younger guys "reviving" the hard-bop that never went out 
of style and others "reviving" various elements of "free-form" that never caught on. I can't think 
of anyone doing anything particularly original ala Parker, Mingus, Davis or Kirk, but there may well 
be nowhere new to go with jazz. The recent Grammy winners have been examples of superb musicianship 
in the service of well-travelled musical avenues.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aaron Levinson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Apology if that was unnecessarily heated


> Dave-
>
> I for one am very curious to see the hard statistical evidence that SF trad bands had "significant 
> black audiences". What does that mean? Half the audience or 3% ? I am pleased that these older 
> cats like Bunk or Wellman found a new career playing music that they loved long after the initial 
> period that produced the first flowering. But the plain fact is that no significant artistic 
> innovation that I am aware of was produced by the movement and it remained largely atavistic from 
> what I can tell.
>
> In the 1950's, during the height of the trad revival Charles Mingus was releasing such classic 
> albums as The Clown, Ah-Um and a host of other groundbreaking recordings. He embraced both New 
> Orleans and Ellington among many others but also stood at the vanguard of forging a new 
> vocabulary. He was in no way dismissive of older jazz forms but he did not "recreate" anything in 
> the process. Jazz (at it's best) has always been a field that respected its own past but 
> concomitantly had both feet planted quite squarely in it's own zeitgeist.
>
> Mingus borrowed freely from these earlier innovators like Armstrong and Duke (who he adored) but 
> he did so in service of making an evolutionary leap. A leap that encompassed all of jazz up to 
> that point and yet was entirely contemporaneous. Listen to "Fables of Faubus" as substantive proof 
> of my assertions. Much of his ensemble work incorporated the controlled mayhem of New Orleans 
> group improvisation but it cannot be mistaken by anyone as anything but integrating these ideas 
> into a totally idiosyncratic and vital context and not in the service of "recreating" a bygone 
> age. In both message and sound it was entirely immersed in the present day.
>
> I am perfectly happy to agree that (overwhelmingly) white people sat back on a sunny day and 
> enjoyed a recreation of a bygone age on a Sunday afternoon in 1956. But to suggest that they were 
> creating something new considering the extraordinary and genuinely innovative work being done by 
> people like Mingus and the Jazz Workshop at the same moment in time seems to me hubristic at best.
>
> One man's opinion,
>
> AA
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 23, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Dave Radlauer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Tom --
>>
>> Thanks for your note.
>>
>> << The young guys driving the revival were second generation white guys
>> playing dixieland, with little or no personal connection to the original
>> musicians. >>
>>
>> Again, not supported by facts.  There were just as many interactions
>> between the Frisco guys and Black musicians from New Orleans -- if not
>> more.  Watters, Helm and those guys sought out black musicians & music
>> (given the segregation in America at the times), and visited New Orleans.
>> And the best bands had significant black audiences -- at least in the East
>> Bay.
>>
>> The whole tradition of Sunday afternoon sessions came from the Watters'
>> Hambone Kelly's club: Sunday pm was for special guests and jammers like:
>> James P Johnson, Danny Barker, Mutt Carey (and even Eddie Condon!).  This
>> tradition led to most of the Jazz Societies, and eventually Festivals
>> around the country.
>>
>> Many New Orleans/Black guys came west to LA and SF.  And interacted with,
>> hired, or jammed with the younger revivalists:
>> A partial list of New Orleans or 'original' black musicians active and
>> engaged with the young West Coast white guys included:
>>
>> Bunk Johnson - spent a year in SF 1942-43 and played with the white guys &
>> rump YBJB (& roomed with Burt Bales)
>> Kid Ory - Club in SF hired all kinds of musicians
>> Amos White - popular trumpeter at Bill Erickson's Pier 23 jam
>> Pops Foster - jammed and played with young dixielanders
>> Wellman Braud - I heard him play with a revival band in the 1980s
>> Earl Hines - performed, broadcast, hired young white guys
>> Darnell Howard - close relations with many Frisco jazz guys
>> Frank Big Boy Goudie - played almost exclusively with 'dixielanders'
>> 1957-63 - Born near and played NOLA golden age
>> Clem Raymond - few facts but played and recorded with Oxtot
>> Sister Lottie Peavy
>> others
>>
>> And several old NYer/Chicagoans were also active here into the 1950s and
>> 60s: Muggsy, Marty Marsala, Joe Sullivan, Joe Darensbourg.  But I can tell
>> you that the impact of early jazz and swing on those guys was just as
>> profound an experience as it had been for the Chicagoans.
>>
>> There were gradations of 'revival.'  Nor was it simply
>> Dave Radlauer
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> hm# 510-848-8323
>> cell# 510-717-5240
>> www.JAZZHOTBigstep.com
>
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager