On 6/9/15 6:55 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> For example: since along with unit name it tells you what
> equipment is needed, 538 is helpful just after collation (as opposed t
> the redundant new 34X fields), but has a later number; 506 (limitation
> on access) and 540 (limitation on use) should be side by side, but are
> not so numbered.
This doesn't seem difficult if the notes are each given a unique name.
In fact, this display is as plausible in MARC as it is in BIBFRAME.
There's no reason for display to be based on MARC tag order, nor for the
34x fields to display at all. So the question remains: are there notes
that are now being given the property bf:note that need to have a unique
name? And I also wonder what displays of notes are being used by the BF
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net