On 12 June 2015 at 22:00, John Hostage <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Those two-month periods are still designated by using months, which are already covered by ISO 8601.
That's fine if you wish to express the date of publication as a
date-range, but fails in, for example, a database with single ISO 8601
(part 2) field for "date".