We're only supposed to apply the second clause of 9.7.1.3 when the
three terms are not "appropriate or sufficiently specific." The two
375s with dates, having terms pulled from the list, do the job just
fine.  "Transgender woman," may be important but under the current
regime it's a datum more suited to a 670.

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Ehlert, Mark K. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT
>>
>> For those of us who follow the instructions (RDA 9.7.1.3), it seems pretty clear
>> that "transgender woman" isn't a choice that's on the table and the DCMZ to
>> 375 pretty much confirms this.
>
>
> Hmm...  I've always read that DCM Z1 guideline narrowly, as a preference for spelled-out RDA terms over ISO codes, not to limiting the 375 to RDA's three prescribed terms and ignoring 9.7.1.3's second sentence on employing other applicable verbiage.
>
> --
> Mark K. Ehlert                 O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library
> Cataloging and Metadata        University of St. Thomas
>   Librarian                    2115 Summit Avenue
> Phone: 651-962-5488            St. Paul, MN 55105
> <http://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/>
>
>   "Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by
> the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of
> Verona," Act I, Scene iii
>
>



-- 
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ