LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  June 2015

PCCLIST June 2015

Subject:

Re: Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question

From:

"Wilson, Pete" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 5 Jun 2015 17:43:54 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Thanks, I appreciate your thoughtful response.

(I'm replying to Amber a little further personally.)

Pete Wilson
Vanderbilt University

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amber M Billey
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 12:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question

Hi Pete,

My response wasn't directed specifically at your comment. Yours was  
just the last one posted before I decided to respond. So, please don't  
take my comments personally.

As for what exactly is offensive? There's a level that I find  
recording gender at all in NAF offensive. The intellectual output of a  
person has nothing to do with their gender. But more specifically that  
there have been discussions how to record the transition in an  
authority record, commenters have been using "his/her" and "it" when  
talking about Ms. Jenner. And other little microaggressions that stack  
up.

I think this conversation is useful for the cataloging community. It's  
most definitely an evolving topic. Especially with the developing LC  
Demographic Group terms list.

Best,
Amber Billey

Quoting "Wilson, Pete" <[log in to unmask]>:

> What, precisely, has been offensive?  The fact that we are having  
> the discussion at all?  If not, what points of view do you consider  
> offensive?  I think it is fair for me to ask this because it was my  
> post you were technically responding to.  My post was specifically  
> about the interesting (well, to me) questions raised by the use of  
> 375 for non-humans.  For instance, imagine trying to come up with a  
> 375 for the lovable children's book character Al the Amoeba.   
> Obviously this was a bit of a joke but it had nothing to do with  
> Caitlyn Jenner.  Absolutely nothing, I promise.  I'll leave off with  
> the facetiae here, though.
>
> Pete Wilson
> Vanderbilt University
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging  
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amber M Billey
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 11:45 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>
> I can no longer sit back and watch this listserv go on about this  
> topic without commenting. It is frankly offensive and insensitive. I  
> will remind everyone that we have transgender members of our  
> community who are on this list, and I cannot even imagine what they  
> are feeling while reading this thread. I will remind everyone that  
> sex and gender are two completely different concepts. Sex is  
> biological while gender is a cultural construction.
>
> Caitlyn Jenner is a transgender woman. We accept her for who she is  
> as she presents herself. END. OF. STORY.
>
> A wonderful example of a NAF for a transgender person is Kate Bornstein.
>
> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n93121104.html
>
> And I strongly suggest that people on this list read her work.
>
> http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38550618
>
> And read our article while your at it.
>
> http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/libfacpub/19/
>
> It will help you understand why we need to critically think about  
> how and why we record gender in Name Authority Files.
>
> Yours in cataloging,
> Amber Billey
>
>
> Quoting "Wilson, Pete" <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Perhaps we need an option in 375 for "asexually reproducing."
>>
>> Pete Wilson
>> Vanderbilt University
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:51 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>
>> Real animals certainly do have biological genders (some can be
>> intersex though, no doubt, just like humans), so I think the
>> definitions in RDA just need tweaking. If you look up biblical figures
>> and deities and other mythological characters, 375 has been used in
>> those records too.
>>
>> Adam Schiff
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Matthew C. Haugen wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 19:37:04 -0400
>>> From: Matthew C. Haugen <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>
>>> Getting back to the topic of gender, I notice that Miss Piggy's NAR
>>> has 375 female, and Kermit's has 375 male.
>>>
>>> The RDA glossary has these definitions:
>>>
>>> Female: The gender designation for woman or girl
>>> Male: The gender designation for man or boy Not known (Gender): The
>>> gender designation when specific gender is unknown
>>>
>>> These definitions also to restrict the gender terms in RDA to human
>>> entities, not to animals, spirits, deities, puppets, robots which may
>>> have a biological or ascribed gender. This is separate from the
>>> question of whether the entity is real or fictitious; Brown, Sneaky
>>> Pie, 1982-, apparently a real (and quite old) cat, also has 375 female.
>>>
>>> Should the glossary be changed? Or should gender not be recorded for
>>> non-human entities?
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Adam L. Schiff
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And yet, when you search Wikipedia for Bruce Jenner's entry, what
>>>> comes up is an entry with Caitlyn Jenner at the head of the article.
>>>> So even that popularly source resource recognizes a single identity
>>>> now known as Caitlyn Jenner.  Bruce Jenner redirects to Caitlyn
>>>> Jenner - that is, Bruce Jenner is a variant form or see reference to
>>>> Caitlyn Jenner.
>>>>
>>>> Adam Schiff
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Chris Baer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 15:58:49 -0400
>>>>> From: Chris Baer <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it is interesting that this discussion quickly moved into
>>>>> the realm of fiction and show-biz fluff, like Bob Hoskins’ car
>>>>> going through the tunnel into Toon Town.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I was asking was a practical question connected to the
>>>>> phenomenon of documentation, not authorship or stage personas.
>>>>>
>>>>> The situation is: a person with a collection of press photos,
>>>>> perhaps the photo morgue of a defunct newspaper; an archivist
>>>>> working for a television station or network who has footage of
>>>>> Jenner ca. 1976 AND 2015; a person who has a Wheaties box in a
>>>>> collection of packaging, or advertising artwork for said box.  With
>>>>> what name should these objects be tagged?  In the middle situation,
>>>>> it would be necessary at times to pick out either Jenner I or
>>>>> Jenner II, but not the other, on short notice.  To call both
>>>>> Caitlyn seems to me absurd.  Jenner’s state of mind at the time  
>>>>> is a non-issue.
>>>>> It takes us through that tunnel into the realms of subjectivity and
>>>>> metaphysics.  There is ample evidence in the materials at hand that
>>>>> he presented himself as Bruce, took the acknowledgement of others
>>>>> as such, and signed papers as such.  That he underwent changes of
>>>>> whatever sort, culminating in a full transition, does not erase the
>>>>> past, even if subjectively he might want to rewrite it.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is why I put “bibliographic identity” in ironic quotes.  This kind
>>>>> of description has nothing to do with “biblio-anything.”   It is a matter
>>>>> of accurately describing what is in front of you so that people
>>>>> coming after will have a good idea of what it is, why it was made,
>>>>> and all those other basic reportorial questions.  Lumping Jenner
>>>>> personas together kind of makes sense when it is two or three
>>>>> things on a bookshelf, but not with things like these that are more
>>>>> likely arranged by provenance and not artificially collected together.
>>>>>
>>>>> The thing that makes this situation interesting is that Jenner I &
>>>>> II are radically different, physically, occupation, sphere of
>>>>> activity, etc.  This is surely more profound than a transvestite
>>>>> putting on temporary things like clothing or wigs, or an actor
>>>>> getting into costume for a role.  Divine out of costume and makeup
>>>>> was no longer recognizably Divine unless he spoke and told you so.
>>>>> Interestingly, I could not find him under either name on the Social
>>>>> Security Death Index, but I would bet that his autopsy and death
>>>>> certificate read Harris Glenn Milstead.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect that the operative phrase is “we as librarians …”  Most
>>>>> likely the person dealing with a TV station’s photo archive is not
>>>>> librarian, nor is the collector of advertising ephemera or
>>>>> autographs, nor the fans, who as I seem to recollect from the
>>>>> “Village Voice” long ago, were in a rush to buy Divine’s personal
>>>>> effects at auction.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I have pointed out before, the problems with library systems
>>>>> like NACO are, first, its acute biblio-centrism, its old basic
>>>>> mission to collate books into as few pigeon holes as possible for
>>>>> efficient retrieval, and second, what might be called, parodying
>>>>> the Maxians, its commodity fetishism.  That is, what counts is if a
>>>>> being has been commodified either by itself or others so that it
>>>>> constitutes a “commodity-persona” (a possible alternate for
>>>>> “bibliographic
>>>>> identity”) or known quantity or marquee name, and then is attached
>>>>> in some way to a work that itself is a commodity and propagated as
>>>>> such, purchases and stuck on shelves or drives or whatever.  So
>>>>> Barry Humphries and Dame Edna are for library purposes distinct
>>>>> commodities, but only if “they” write under both names, whereas
>>>>> from an archival/administrative perspective, there is only Barry
>>>>> Humphries, and Dame Edna is just him in a intentionally misleading
>>>>> wrapper.  Dame Edna does not have a passport or hea!
>>>>>
>>>> lth insurance.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Allowing that this situation would not have been possible without
>>>>> modern medical techniques, Jenner I & II are definitely radically
>>>>> different commodities in every sense of the word if any pair are,
>>>>> and in a way that Milstead/Divine and others were not, and they are
>>>>> significantly different as beings, bibliographic identities or not,
>>>>> in the same way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Assuming that the Jenner story is common knowledge and that the
>>>>> patron can figure it out is exactly what I meant by “presentism.”
>>>>> That is true for people devoted to “Inside Edition” and its ilk
>>>>> now, but in the future, Jenner will probably recede like Jim
>>>>> Thorpe, Buster Crabbe, Don Schollander and other Olympic champions
>>>>> of the past, known only to specialists.  Of course, by then no one
>>>>> may care and the works will all have been destroyed.
>>>>>
>>>>> But in the meantime, how does the person describe that Wheaties box art?
>>>>>
>>>>> The question is important both because of the wide range of
>>>>> non-bibliographic works like the hypothetical Jenner images being
>>>>> subject to web-based description, and because of the proliferation
>>>>> of web-based self-publication, self-commodification, and the
>>>>> opportunities for anyone to be one or more celebrities outside the
>>>>> limits of their own heads.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Baer
>>>>> Hagley Museum and Library
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:25 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> If Bruce Jenner had been a drag queen who used a Caitlyn persona
>>>>> for performances, maybe that would have been a second identity,
>>>>> “bibliographic”
>>>>> or otherwise.  That is not the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even then, though, I notice that RuPaul has only one NACO authority
>>>>> record, as do Barry Humphries, who “is” Dame Edna, and Divine, born
>>>>> Glenn Milstead.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Ted cites 9.2.2.8 correctly.  I think a better argument for
>>>>> dual identities could be made for drag performers than for Jenner.
>>>>> How is Dame Edna any less separate a persona than Mark Twain was
>>>>> from Samuel Clemens?
>>>>> What Jenner has done, however, could not be described as
>>>>> maintaining two separate identities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete Wilson
>>>>> Vanderbilt University
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted P Gemberling
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 6:56 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete and Chris:
>>>>> 9.2.2.8 does say: “If an individual *has* more than one identity,
>>>>> choose the name associated with each identity as the preferred name
>>>>> for that identity.” I highlighted the word *has* because that
>>>>> distinguishes this section from the previous one, which is about an
>>>>> individual who changes his name. 9.2.2.7 says if an individual
>>>>> changes his name, use the latest name as the established form.
>>>>> Jenner seems to fall under 9.2.2.7. He would be considered for more
>>>>> than one identity if he published things under both names
>>>>> concurrently. The present tense of *has* seems to be important  
>>>>> to 9.2.2.8.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now of course it’s true that changing your gender is a lot bigger
>>>>> deal than changing your name. But I doubt that we as librarians can
>>>>> take account of that distinction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ted Gemberling
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:23 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you can propose a new way of looking at this, but there have
>>>>> been many cases of sex changes already and many examples of name
>>>>> authority records for the people involved.  So far, we are treating
>>>>> both the before person and the after person as the same person,
>>>>> which seems appropriate to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is already established that a (significant) change of name means
>>>>> a new authority for a corporate body, but not usually for a person.
>>>>> Names vary all the time.  Rosanne has been credited as Rosanne
>>>>> Arnold here and Rosanne Barr there.  We trace her as just “Rosanne,
>>>>> 1952- “ anyway.  Farrah Fawcett has frequently been credited or
>>>>> referred to as Farrah Fawcett-Majors, but we don’t call that a
>>>>> separate identity.  Why is this a special case?
>>>>>  Jenner would argue that she is the same person she always was.  If
>>>>> a special approach is not needed in principle for this case, is it
>>>>> needed just to avoid mass confusion?  I seriously doubt it.  The
>>>>> general public knows Jenner and her story and can work it out.  In
>>>>> the case of a less-known person for whom there might be more
>>>>> confusion, we wouldn’t even be talking about this—and that kind of
>>>>> confusion occurs in regard to lesser-known people for all sorts of
>>>>> reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete Wilson
>>>>> Vanderbilt University
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Baer
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 4:08 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> Not so fast.  What is a “bibliographic identity” anyway?  Surely
>>>>> nothing that any other discipline would recognize, or the IRS, or
>>>>> the DMV or any agency of the state.  This seems to me to be another
>>>>> example of catalogers thinking that their resources are somehow
>>>>> more “real” than the things represented in them.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is in fact a biological entity that was born a man and
>>>>> transitioned to a woman.  This is quite different than simply
>>>>> choosing to write different variants of one’s name, using initials,
>>>>> adopting a gang nickname or criminal alias, etc.  Such a change of
>>>>> identity must in fact be recognized by the state through the
>>>>> issuing of new papers, etc.  This is quite different from someone
>>>>> appearing in certain situations under a stage name or writing under
>>>>> one or more pseudonyms.  It is in fact a true case of earlier/later
>>>>> names and receives official sanction as such.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are also practical considerations, especially as regards to
>>>>> original documentation.  Given her age, what are we going to see
>>>>> from Caitlyn after the media frenzy dies down?  A tell-all memoir?
>>>>> Case studies by social scientists and advocates?  Compare that with
>>>>> all the extant photographic and video footage of Bruce, not to
>>>>> mention Wheaties ads, a terrible movie, and who knows what else.
>>>>> Are these all to be identified now as Caitlyn?  Really?!  Are the
>>>>> official Olympic and other registries of athletic records to be
>>>>> revised as in Stalin’s Russia?  The fact is that, unlike some of
>>>>> the other gender reassignment cases, the achievements as Bruce and
>>>>> those as Caitlyn will be very different, if only because of age.
>>>>> Whatever one’s views of the politics of the matter, this is a
>>>>> significant enough change to count as a before-and-after, which is
>>>>> how the law would recognize it.  The same would be true of any
>>>>> other change of name that receives legal sanction through the filin!
>>>>>
>>>> g of official papers for whatever reason, whether of a person, ship,
>>>> building, kept animal, or whatever.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As a historian, I find this sort of flattening of historical
>>>>> complexity disturbing, when it leads to the creation of false or
>>>>> anachronistic labels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Baer
>>>>> Hagley Museum and Library
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 5:56 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> No.  The same “bibliographic identity” used to be called Bruce and
>>>>> is now called Caitlyn.  See Wendy Carlos, Deirdre N. McCloskey and
>>>>> Jan Morris
>>>>> (1926-) for other examples.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete Wilson
>>>>> Vanderbilt University
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted P Gemberling
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 4:44 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> Laura,
>>>>> I just wonder: does that constitute a different bibliographic identity?
>>>>> Should there be a 500 for Bruce Jenner?
>>>>> Ted Gemberling
>>>>> UAB Lister Hill Library
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Laura Elizabeth
>>>>> Simpson
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 4:12 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: [PCCLIST] Inevitable Caitlyn Jenner NAR question
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>> Hope you’re having a good day. I was just wondering about how
>>>>> people feel about the 375 in this record.  That’s the first time
>>>>> I’ve actually someone explicitly identified as transgender in a
>>>>> 375, but I can’t help wondering whether they would want to be
>>>>> labeled as such. I am just curious and wanted to be respectful to
>>>>> anyone whose NAR I am working with in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!!
>>>>> Laura
>>>>> ____
>>>>>
>>>>> 010  n  79022162
>>>>> 040  DLC ǂb eng ǂe rda ǂc DLC ǂd WaU
>>>>> 046  ǂf 19491028
>>>>> 1001 Jenner, Caitlyn, ǂd 1949-
>>>>> 370  Mount Kisco (N.Y.) ǂc United States ǂe Malibu (Calif.) ǂ2 naf
>>>>> 372  Decathlon ǂa Acting ǂ2 lcsh
>>>>> 373  Olympic Games (20th : 1972 : Munich, Germany) ǂa Olympic Games
>>>>> (21st
>>>>> : 1976 : Montréal, Québec) ǂ2 naf
>>>>> 374  Decathletes ǂa Olympic athletes ǂa Actors ǂa Television
>>>>> personalities ǂ2 lcsh
>>>>> 375  transgender woman
>>>>> 375  female ǂs 2015
>>>>> 375  male ǂs 1949 ǂt 2015
>>>>> 377  eng
>>>>> 378  ǂq William Bruce
>>>>> 4001 Jenner, Bruce, ǂd 1949- ǂw nne
>>>>> 4001 Jenner, William Bruce, ǂd 1949-
>>>>> 670  His Decathlon challenge, c1977.
>>>>> 670  Wikipedia, February 8, 2015 ǂb (Bruce Jenner; William Bruce
>>>>> Jenner (born October 28, 1949) is a former U.S. track and field
>>>>> athlete and current television personality. He won the gold medal
>>>>> in the decathlon at the 1976 Summer Olympics held in Montreal; born Mt.
>>>>> Kisco, New York;
>>>>> residence: Malibu, California; tenth place at the 1972 Summer
>>>>> Olympics held in Munich, Germany; following Jenner's Olympic
>>>>> victory, his professional career led to new success in television.
>>>>> By 1981, he had starred in several made-for-TV movies and was Erik
>>>>> Estrada's replacement briefly on the top-rated TV series CHiPs;
>>>>> nominated for the 1980 Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor for
>>>>> his performance in Can't Stop the Music. That was the end of his
>>>>> theatrical movie career until he appeared in 2011's Jack and Jill
>>>>> in a scene with Al Pacino as an actor in a play)
>>>>> 670  Bruce Jenner comes out as transgender woman, via NBC News
>>>>> website, April 24, 2015 ǂb (Former Olympic champion and reality
>>>>> television star Bruce Jenner broke the silence on transitioning to
>>>>> a woman Friday [April 24, 2015], telling ABC's Diane Sawyer, "For
>>>>> all intents and purposes, I am a woman") ǂu
>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/celebrity/bruce-jenner-comes-out
>>>>> -
>>>>> transgender-woman-n348181
>>>>> 670  Caitlyn Jenner, formerly Bruce Jenner, debuts on the cover of
>>>>> Vanity Fair, via CBC News website, posted Jun 01, 2015, viewed June
>>>>> 2, 2015 ǂb (Caitlyn Jenner; transgender Olympic gold medallist and
>>>>> reality star makes public debut as a woman; the iconic U.S.
>>>>> Olympian and parent in the extended Kardashian family formerly
>>>>> known as Bruce Jenner debuted as a woman Monday [June 1, 2015] on
>>>>> the cover of Vanity Fair magazine) ǂu
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/trending/caitlyn-jenner-formerly-bruce-jenne
>>>>> r
>>>>> -debuts-on-the-cover-of-vanity-fair-1.3095470
>>>>> 670  Wikipedia, June 2, 2015 ǂb (Caitlyn Jenner (born October 28,
>>>>> 1949), formerly known as Bruce Jenner; American former track and
>>>>> field athlete and current television personality; born William
>>>>> Bruce Jenner, Mount Kisco, New York; residence: Malibu, California;
>>>>> other
>>>>> names: Bruce Jenner (1949-2015))
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______
>>>>> Laura Simpson
>>>>> Assistant Librarian/Cataloger
>>>>> Mervyn H. Sterne Library
>>>>> Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham
>>>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> / 205-934-3512
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> Adam L. Schiff
>>>> Principal Cataloger
>>>> University of Washington Libraries
>>>> Box 352900
>>>> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>>>> (206) 543-8409
>>>> (206) 685-8782 fax
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthew C. Haugen
>>> Rare Book Cataloger
>>> 102 Butler Library
>>> Columbia University Libraries
>>> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>> Phone: 212-851-2451
>>>
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Adam L. Schiff
>> Principal Cataloger
>> University of Washington Libraries
>> Box 352900
>> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>> (206) 543-8409
>> (206) 685-8782 fax
>> [log in to unmask]
>> http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager