I think I would use author since the catalog is textual. Compiler could be another possible choice. Corporate creation trumps personal creation, so if you have both you would do 110 for corporate creator and 700 for the person. And I would probably use either author or compiler for that too.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Amy Turner wrote:
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:04:10 +0000
> From: Amy Turner <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: relationship designator for main entry of a museum catalog
> Museums are considered creators of their catalogs, according to RDA 18.104.22.168.1 and its LC-PCC PS (as far as I can tell, unchanged from AACR2 and the LCRIs). I don't see a specific relationship designator for this case in Appendix I. So would "author" be appropriate? If there is also a person who is presented on the title page as author of the catalog, would the museum get the main entry with $e author and the person an added entry, also with $e author?
> Amy Turner
> Cataloger and Authority Control Coordinator, Duke University Libraries
> [log in to unmask]
Adam L. Schiff
University of Washington Libraries
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]