Weren't most of the Bing Crosby broadcasts at the University of Texas originally recorded to tape? I
remember reading that Jack Mullin would reuse bits of tape he edited out, but were whole shows
erased and reused? If not, why aren't the tapes the master medium and why are the transcription
disks necessary for archival purposes? Aren't they inherently inferior since they are at best
second-generation dubs and more likely are second-generation dubs made down a phone line?
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Coe" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Radio Transcription Disc Label Gallery
Awesome page, thanks for sharing! Thought I’d pass along a few other helpful pages I’ve bookmarked
over the years about instantaneous lacquer discs:
http://www.phonozoic.net/recordio/ (Labelography of home recording discs)
http://tenwatts.blogspot.com/2010/11/voice-o-graph-labelography.html (Blog with several posts
detailing the labelography of Voice-O-Graph discs)
https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~hollyr/portfolio/projects/instadiscs/bing.html (Bing Crosby radio
broadcast discs, 1949 - 1954)
Lastly, I have my own little gallery of select “home recording" lacquers I’ve transferred:
http://cuttingcorporation.com/home-recording-discs/
-Aaron
_______________________
http://cuttingcorporation.com
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 10:09 AM, David Lewis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> http://www.jerrysoldtimeradio.com/tdl-001/
>
> Just published page, and I think it's very nice. There are disc labels that
> mirror the appearance of home recording blanks, professional discs,
> what have you,
>
> best,
>
> Uncle Dave Lewis
> Hamilton, OH
|