LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  October 2015

ARSCLIST October 2015

Subject:

AW: [ARSCLIST] AW: [ARSCLIST] for those interested in the biggest Star Wars news this side of the galaxy

From:

David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Breneman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:06:38 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (124 lines)

I shouldn't have spoken so broadly. I didn't mean that it was dark in that there
was no creativity, it just was dark, as in ominous, frequently depressing
(films like Taxi Driver and Easy Rider were more an ordeal than an
entertainment) and ambivalent.  A film that started without a studio logo
often as not just ended, with no resolution to the story.  It was like you came
in after the start and left before the end.

Dark, ominous, ambivalent - that's the 70s.  It was like the 30s, but without
the belief in a better tomorrow.  A lot like the current decade in that regard.


--
David Breneman
[log in to unmask]
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [ARSCLIST] AW: [ARSCLIST] for those interested in the biggest Star Wars news this side of the galaxy
Datum: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:59:02 +0200
Von: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
An: [log in to unmask]

Hi Dave:

Maybe for you the 70s was a "dark era" for films. Definitely not for me. Many of my favorite films 
were made then. The concept of moving away from fake Hollywood ideas of life was embraced, 
technology allowed for mostly on-location shooting and even sound production, and the movies started 
reflecting more of actual life, which, in reality (as opposed to smarmy fake Hollywood fantasy) IS 
"dark"!

Great documentary about all of this, "Under the Influence":
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0342275/

To name just a few of my favorite movies that would never have been made in pre-70's Hollywood: 
"Dirty Harry," "The Godfather" parts 1 and 2, "Jaws," "The Exorcist" (in my opinion, the scariest 
movie ever made), "The Omen," "Needle Park," etc. etc. This was also the era of some great rock 
concert movies and also some classic documentaries. The very fact that many of us felt the US was 
going down the toilet was a huge influence on movie-making at that time. The cameras captured the 
nastiness of 70s life, and reflected back that, indeed, the country was spiraling down the bowl, 
much like NOW! The difference today is that young people are obsessed with "emojis" and Facebook and 
other nonsense and thus don't pay attention long enough to pick up a movie camera and document the 
rot or turn it into realistically dark tales for the big screen. That said, there have been a few 
very good movies made in recent years, and when it's done right, out in reality-land (as opposed to 
a few elite big-city theaters and a few elite suburban art-cinema theaters), digital projection is 
superior in all ways to worn-out films running on out-of-focus projectors operated by stoned kids 
with no technical knowledge.

By the way, the formula is there for a new revolution in films. Hollywood studios are conglomerated 
and choose to not use actors in favor of stupid animation, blue screens and digital toys (and end up 
with movies just as fake-looking and dull as the big soundstage musicals of the 30's). There is very 
little skill in script-writing these days, and comic books seem to rule the roost as far as "plot" 
fodder. And, like in the 70s, there have been technological breakthroughs that miniaturize and 
simplify film-making. One example that I hoped heralded a new wave was "District 9", a great sci-fi 
film out of South Africa about 10 years ago now. But, the followup by members of that team was the 
ill-conceived and ill-fated "Chappy."

Hollywood's utter failure has led to the move by much movie-making creativity to cable TV, 
particularly HBO, AMC and Cinemax. Shows like "Walking Dead," "True Detective" and even "Vikings" on 
History Channel use dialog, acting, plot-progression and a two-armed embrace of the current 
"darkness" to make riveting entertainment. Meanwhile, traditional networks, especially Disney-owned 
ABC, offer on-screen fairy tales (literally), treated the evening audience as if they are 5 years 
old. And that's the one or two evenings a week where traditional networks actually offer produced 
programming. The rest of the time is mind-rotting "reality" shows, talentless "singing and dancing 
contests" and new takes on stale game-show ideas. Yuk!

Finally, note that Star Wars itself wouldn't have been made in pre-1970's Hollywood. What, a 
serialized sci-fi series with a distinctly cowboy-western flavor to it? No way! The success of 
earlier rebel films, especially "The Godfather" and "Jaws" are what cleared the ground for Star 
Wars. I cite those two movies especially because they proved that "outsiders" could do complex plots 
with relatively large budgets and ambitious filming locations and schedules, and make lots of money 
for the producers. Regarding Star Wars, one man's opinion here -- the first movie was pretty darn 
good, I remember seeing it with my father and brothers as an older kid and enjoying it but thinking 
it was too neat a package. I'll always prefer the original, un-digitized un-"fixed" version, with 
the models and no computer animation (available only on the original Laserdisc, as I understand 
it -- all subsequent releases have included the digital  re-do of the plastic-model scenes). But, 
the second movie, "The Empire Strikes Back," was the classic. All subsequent movies were 
progressively less interesting, to my taste. "Empire Strikes Back" was one of those cases where 
there was just enough creativity, budget and technology to allow a still-hungry film-maker to tell a 
great story.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Breneman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:08 PM
Subject: [ARSCLIST] AW: [ARSCLIST] for those interested in the biggest Star Wars news this side of 
the galaxy


Von: Music Hunter <[log in to unmask]>

> As a big Star Wars fan, I couldn't be more excited to bring this offer to
> you.   To coincide with the release of the most anticipated movie of the
> year, Sony is releasing Star Wars: The Ultimate Soundtrack Collection box
> sets on both CD and vinyl.

I did some looking into this, and I was surprised to learn that the CDs
for the first three / middle three / whatever films feature the 20th Century
Fox fanfare (1933) and Cinemascope Extension (1954) by Alfred
Newman.  That was not on the original soundtrack LP album I have
from the first / fourth film.  I've always wanted a clean copy of that
audio trademark, and my investigation yielded  an mp3 copy I could
download from Amazon for 99 cents.  It has evidence of tape hiss,
which in addition to indicating an admirable light touch in noise
reduction, also tells me that it's from the original soundtrack.

For movie fans, the 70s were a dark era.  Hell, for *everyone* the 70s
were a dark era.  Movie studios frequently started films "cold" without
a logo, as studio logos were considered passe'.  One of the great things
that got the viewer in the mood for a really amazing cinematic experience
with Star Wars was when the 20th Century Fox logo and fanfare burst
onto the screen in a way that hadn't been seen in well over a decade.
It set the scene for what was to follow.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Profitieren Sie von der sicheren E-Mail-√úbertragung Ihrer Daten mit einer kostenlosen E-Mail-Adresse 
der Telekom.
www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos


----------------------------------------------------------------
Profitieren Sie von der sicheren E-Mail-√úbertragung Ihrer Daten mit einer kostenlosen E-Mail-Adresse der Telekom.
www.t-online.de/email-kostenlos

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager