The closest anybody has come to having actual science is not very high res
magnified before and after pictures at the Keith Monks website. Everyone
seems to say that when they use their favored system, they can tell it
works because the sound is better. Maybe all the systems work? Perhaps
instead of looking at the grooves, a better test would be to compare the
auditory results.

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Shai Drori <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Not even close to the original. The original was microfiber special type of
> fabric that had a one direction for cleaning. It went into the grove to
> pick up dirt. For a teenage on a budget it was terrific. The new ones are
> just corduroy.
> BTW, I have been reading everything on this thread. I must say That the
> Goldman dude hasn't convinced me even a bit. Too much vague claims with no
> hard evidence for anything.
>
> Cheers
> Shai Drori
> Expert digitization services for Audio Video
> Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
> www.audiovideofilm.com
> [log in to unmask]
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > <http://www.needledoctor.com/Discwasher-D4-Kit>
> >
> > I bought one of the RCA look-alikes and it is not nearly as good, of
> > course,
> > <L>
> > Lou Judson
> > Intuitive Audio
> > 415-883-2689
> >
> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree that's a good one. Can you get the fluid anymore?
> > > Another good one is the LAST cleaner -- some sort of smelly solvent
> with
> > a nail polish brush.
> > >
> > > -- Tom Fine
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shai Drori" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:55 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cleaning stylus
> > >
> > >
> > >> I have been using the Discwasher stylus brush that came with my kit
> > that I
> > >> bought around 1986. Still works wonders.
> >
>



--
Frank B Strauss, DMD