LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2016

ARSCLIST January 2016

Subject:

Re: RDX vx. LTO

From:

"subscribe arsclist Jayney Wallick Jayney Jayney Wallick Bard at Large www.bardatlarge.com (206) 286-6691" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:03:52 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (161 lines)

Bon Soir Henri,

Many thanks for your most informative post. I'm beginning to think I should 
stick with LTO, but it really is a pain. I'll see what I can find out about 
external LTO drives and see if they're any easier to install than the 
internal variety. I only say this because I have a rack full of unused LTO 
tapes already.

Many thanks,

Jayney

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:08:17 +0100, Henri Chamoux 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Hi Jayney, greetings from France !
>
>An intereting fact about RDX I believe : please check on the video I
>just found there : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65bpj1p26fU
>and please do not miss the instructive comments among which one
>understands that RDX is nothing else than a common 2.5'' harddrive
>(brand is seagate) into a plastic box with a bit of rubber suspension.
>Do not be cheated ! I believe a bunch of external drives  (USB or
>E-SATA) will do the same job and save your money.
>
>Having responsibilies in acquiring and preserving audio data, I usually
>make use of CF cards, making saves on 3.5'' harddrives exclusively,
>should they be raid arrays or non-raid, but always with redundant copies
>stored in different places.
>If LTO seems to be the best placed for long term preservation of huge
>archives, I believe it is not convenient for a budget or a single
>entrepreneur and that redundant hard drives may remain the most
>reasonable option.
>
>Regards,
>Henri (like Corey a happy user in the easy world of Linux)
>
>--
>Henri CHAMOUX
>
>http://phonobase.hypotheses.org : les derniers documents mis en ligne sur 
la Phonobase
>http://www.phonobase.org : 9600 disques et cylindres de la Belle Époque à 
écouter en ligne
>http://www.archeophone.org : l'archéophone, lecteur universel de cylindres 
phonographiques
>Le Dictabelt, support d'enregistrement audio des années 1950 : 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcWAjKrve7A
>Nelson Mandela sur cylindres, ou la numérisation en cours du procès de 
Rivonia :
>http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6N0zhxNtMG8tcao84M
>--
>École normale supérieure
>LARHRA - UMR 5190
>Pôle histoire numérique
>1 rue Maurice Arnoux
>92120 Montrouge
>
>Tel : 06 64 80 00 81
>[log in to unmask]
>
>http://larhra.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/membre/113
>
>
>
>
>
>Le 27/01/2016 08:59, subscribe arsclist Jayney Wallick Jayney Jayney
>Wallick Bard at Large www.bardatlarge.com (206) 286-6691 a écrit :
>> Thanks Corey,
>>
>> You say "continue with LTO if you have the data to warrant the cost." It
>> took me roughly 2 1/2 years to fill up one 1.5 TB LTO tape. What I don't
>> understand is that if RDX drives and LTO tapes both are lifetested to 
last
>> 30 years, why is LTO better? I'm guessing an external LTO drive doesn't 
plug
>> in to a USB port like an RDX drive. Also, as the computer repair folks 
keep
>> reminding me, Windows 10 (that they just installed after completely
>> rebuilding my system) doesn't support LTO, or tape drives at all. Does 
the
>> IT model suggest using unsupported hardware with an OS? Just curious. Of
>> course, maybe my system is no longer a good candidate for tape backup, 
but
>> since it's just been rebuilt from the ground up, I need a good archival
>> backup system that works with what I've got. That's why I was considering
>> RDX. Thoughts?
>>
>> Many thanks for all your help,
>>
>> Jayney
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:15:20 -0800, Corey Bailey 
<[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jayney,
>>>
>>> I would follow the IT model and continue with LTO if you have the data
>>> to warrant the cost. BTW: The "IT model" suggests two copies of your LTO
>>> tapes separated geographically with "near line" access to the files
>>> being on separate media of your choice. The occasion of the computer
>>> power supply going down and taking everything inside the case with it
>>> (been there, done that) is basically the cost of doing business.
>>>
>>> We asked for this when we taught sand how to think.
>>>
>>> Corey
>>> Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
>>>
>>> On 1/26/2016 1:30 PM, subscribe arsclist Jayney Wallick Jayney Jayney
>>> Wallick Bard at Large www.bardatlarge.com (206) 286-6691 wrote:
>>>> Hi There,
>>>>
>>>> I record live music, and have been doing so since 1974. Several years 
ago I
>>>> managed to transfer what I wanted to save to DDS tape, until I started
>>>> recording to Compact Flash cards in 2012. Since then I've been backing
>>>> everything up to LTO until late last month/year when my computer's 
power
>>>> supply failed, frying the LTO drive in the process. I have only filled 
up
>>>> one LTO tape in that time, and had started a second late in 2014. The
>>>> partial tape had to be sacrificed to run the diagnostics used to 
determine
>>>> that the LTO drive was damaged.
>>>>
>>>> I know of a service that can transfer LTO tapes to other media. My 
research
>>>> seems to indicate that both RDX drives and LTO tapes are life-tested to 
last
>>>> 30 years. Given that the RDX drive can be an external USB drive, and 
the LTO
>>>> drive has to have a computer-specific SAS or some other such card to 
support
>>>> it, and requires separate installation, which of these media do you 
think is
>>>> more archival? Just to be clear, I record on two compact flash cards, 
so
>>>> already have the audio files in two places when I leave the concert, 
and
>>>> then go home and back them up to have a third place. Do you think 
there's an
>>>> advantage, archivally speaking, between LTO and RDX, or is it six of 
one,
>>>> and half a dozen of the other? I'd like to make a purchase decision by 
1-29-
>>>> 16 if at all possible, so if someone could please reply soon I'd 
greatly
>>>> appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jayney
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 
=========================================================================
>=========================================================================

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager