LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2016

ARSCLIST January 2016

Subject:

Re: Cleaning stylus

From:

H D Goldman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:53:19 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (114 lines)

Hi David,

Yes sir.  Our approach was to develop materials & protocols to clean, if possible, all main disc substrates [lacquer, shellac, acetate, vinyl & Edison Diamond Disc] & be able to perform as well regardless of whether fluids were removed manually or with the aid of a vacuum source.  And this approach has satisfied amateurs & professionals for a quarter century.  Some users don’t want to work with the rag approach & others don’t want to spend the money on a vacuum-based approach ….. it a matter of users choice.

The most critical requirement, aside from doing no harm, was the need to thoroughly & safely remove the mold-release waxes from the groove & keep them in solution.  If you accomplish this using potent, highly water soluble surfactants of sufficient purity, the fluid can be readily removed using high density pure cotton, small loop terry cloth quite effectively.  

A rinse is still required regardless of how the fluids are removed.  If you go around 1 time & a finger width on a vacuum-wand based machine or take ~ 2 sec to pass a 7” section of cloth, loop side down, around a 12” disc, you end up with a very lightly damn surface containing a trace of the surfactants.

This small residue of the surfactants is sufficient to act as a wetting agent & permit the rinse water to penetrate the groove for an effective rinse.  

And just a comment.  I don’t like having to repeat these comments …. I’ve never joined a list to simply promote a product.  I’ve spend years around acoustic machines & have fully reconditioned both a Columbia BMWN open-horn machine and a Victor Credenza.  I’ve re-built & listened to most of Victor's & Columbia’s sound boxes and identified & use a number of modern lubricants to improve motor & sound performance.  All because I wanted to understand what people were listening to in the day & to push the overall performance.

It’s all about the beauty & enjoyment of fine sound reproduction.  

Regards,

Duane Goldman

H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd. 
PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
v/f 314 205 1388  [log in to unmask]





> On Jan 16, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Dave Burnham <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Mr.Goldman
> 
> Surely you're not suggesting that any manual drying with any kind of cloth or brush is as thorough as a thread connected to a powerful vacuum that lifts the cleaning fluid residue and whatever else remains at the bottom of a groove out and removes it completely. 
> 
> db 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jan 16, 2016, at 1:19 PM, H D Goldman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Frank,
>> 
>> I’d suggest that the first the evaluation of a cleaning approach is thru listening before & then again after the cleaned disc has been played several times.  The safety of the chemicals involved can be evaluated readily from their known chemical properties & simple testing.  Further validation comes from long term study of treated surfaces under environmental challenge.  Ultimately it comes down to the perceived value of the cleaning itself. 
>> 
>> Finally you run larger studies of the approach involving varied substrates & end user methods.
>> 
>> Electron micrographs & vibrational correlations are a wonderful idea but they won’t change the real-time data that has already been accumulated by tens of thousands of users over 25+ years.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Duane Goldman
>> 
>> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd. 
>> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
>> v/f 314 205 1388  [log in to unmask]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> n Jan 16, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have viewed this subject on the ARSCLIST several times over the past
>>> ​ ​
>>> several​ years, often with a fair bit of
>>> ​flame​
>>> attached​​​, and I think Tom is right.  Someone needs to study the effects
>>> of different cleaning regimens
>>> ​scentifically.  Anybody can say their system is the best, but until
>>> someone actually examines the whole groove before and after cleaning, there
>>> is no way of knowing for sure.  How to examine the whole groove before and
>>> after cleaning is a grand question.  Can you do it with an optical device?
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Date:    Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:16:30 -0500
>>>>> From:    Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Cleaning stylus
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Steve:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you cite the presentation, preferably a link to the conference
>>>> page? I would like to study
>>>>> that presentation, see what their methodology was. LOC has resources
>>>> where we may have the
>>>>> microscope photos and the like. I also hope they addressed the issues of
>>>> every day cleaning of
>>>>> regular records, not just fragile problem cases.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Steve Smolian" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 9:59 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cleaning stylus
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The results of the Library of Congress' rigorous testing of record
>>>> cleaning products were presented
>>>>> by them at a recent ARSC Conference- last year of that of the previous
>>>> one.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Though not named, the product that best the others, and by a
>>>> considerable margin, was Disc Doctor.
>>>>> There are legal reasons such Government testing does not identify
>>>> products going back to NSIT's
>>>>> earlier days.  The presentation was made in such way, however, that it
>>>> was murkily clear that Disc
>>>>> Doctor prevailed, and this was confirmed to me privately elsewhere.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Steven Smolian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Frank B Strauss, DMD

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager