LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2016

ARSCLIST January 2016

Subject:

Re: Cassttes - Re: [ARSCLIST] One more sticky-shed data point - Richardson treated tape

From:

Marie O'Connell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 23:55:12 +1300

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

I've been doing mass digitisation of cassette recordings in our collections
from the 1980's and 1990's since 2014.  The tape stock is unknown as the
paperwork from the originator is not available/gone. The casings have not
identifying markings unfortunately.

These cassettes are proving to be perfect for this and I have already done
over 7,000 cassettes which are either C60 or C90.

So far I have had a handful of tapes which I have had to re-house in new
shells; several hubs which have splintered due to earthquake impact and
rendered the cassette to not turn, but in the main they are perfect
contenders for this type of work with little human interaction apart from
turning the tape over and inputting relevant metadata.

This is easily done as background work with spreadsheets and preserved in
real time.  I run two Tascam workhorses in the background each day and can
get through about 60 odd x C60 cassettes each week.

Just another interesting experience...
Cheers
Marie



On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> YES! I forgot to mention Ampex Grandmaster cassettes circa late 1970s. I
> had some in my collection and they ended up being the first cassettes I
> baked, because they squeeled and ground to a halt, having gummed up the
> static parts of the tape path.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard L. Hess" <
> [log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassttes - Re: [ARSCLIST] One more sticky-shed
> data point - Richardson treated tape
>
>
> Yes and the Zoom recorders -- even the H1 -- are very usable.
>>
>> As to your other question, I think some Ampex cassettes come to mind for
>> baking. Why am I not surprised.
>>
>> I suspect that the relative lack of process control has as much to do
>> with binder breakdown susceptibility as basic formulation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/2016 2:41 PM, Lou Judson wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed it would! I was once hired to record oral histories of SF Port
>>> people before they passed on. We had four couples around a table in the
>>> Ferry Building, responding to questions and conversing. Each had a lavalier
>>> mic and we used a Dugan System auto mixer into Pro Tools. Two sessions like
>>> that before they ran out of funding. ’Twas fun while it lasted and sounded
>>> darn good!
>>>
>>> I had a few dozen cassettes of a famus psychologist to transfer from
>>> classes at a college back East. I noticed that the last few words were
>>> repeated on the other side, and sure enough later on they got the original
>>> reels, and I got to do it all again but better. Been there, done that! :-)
>>>
>>> Good move to make them more affordable - ethics trump (Ooo, hard to use
>>> that word any more!) profits.
>>>
>>> It has amazed me how good a recording can be made with an iPhone laying
>>> on a table - they are so thin, it is like a PZM, and can be enhanced for
>>> pretty good clarity!
>>>
>>> (I recommend Retro Recorder for this - been using it for meeting records
>>> and darn good for that!)
>>> <http://mcdsp.com/2013/08/06/retro-recorder/> and they got the visual
>>> design just right:
>>> <http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/review/retro_recorder_1.1.1> More than
>>> a toy!)
>>> <L>
>>> Lou Judson
>>> Intuitive Audio
>>> 415-883-2689
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Richard L. Hess <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/20/2016 8:49 PM, Lou Judson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I wish people would hire engineers to record oral histories!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't that be Nirvana?
>>>>
>>>> I recall that there was one client who had a mix of reels and cassettes
>>>> of oral histories. They started out with reels. Someone made cassette
>>>> copies of the reels so the client wanted me to digitize the cassette
>>>> copies, but she didn't want to pay the extra cost of digitizing from the
>>>> reels (the reels needed baking). I dropped my price on the reels as I
>>>> refused to do it from the cassettes when the reels were still transferrable.
>>>>
>>>> The reels were good--even the 1.88 in/s ones, though the odd 7.5 in/s
>>>> one was spectacular. Anyway, I convinced myself that the reels were
>>>> recorded by someone who knew what they were doing with a good external mic
>>>> (like usually came with a Uher).
>>>>
>>>> So then they got to the cassettes...yup, $29.95 drugstore cassette
>>>> recorders with built-in mics sitting just far enough off tables...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> Richard L. Hess                   email: [log in to unmask]
>> Aurora, Ontario, Canada                             647 479 2800
>> http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
>> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.
>>
>>
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager