LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2016

ARSCLIST January 2016

Subject:

Re: Cassttes - Re: [ARSCLIST] One more sticky-shed data point - Richardson treated tape

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:11:17 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (138 lines)

Hi Fred:

I actually love the ambient noises that come through in the recordings. For one thing, they can date 
the timeframe. For instance old WECO phones just aren't around in most people's lives anymore, but 
they were around and ringing all the time in the 60s, 70s and into the 80s. Then, after the Bell 
System got broken up, you get the 3rd-party phones with all the strange electronic ringers, and 
nowadays you get cellphone sounds (and leakage into microphones, especially from Blackberry 
devices). When I did the big project for the state of NM, I noticed how often people would be 
interviewed outside, probably because it was hot indoors, and how loud the old cars and trucks were. 
It's also interesting to hear the old planes flying overhead in the 60s and 70s, very different 
sounds from today. All of this is great, of course, if it doesn't drown out the interview voices!

The other thing I love is random audio on the heads and tails of the interview tapes, stuff like old 
off-air radio recordings, needle-drops of old records, etc. It firmly dates and locates the 
recordist.

Having been able to pull out audible human communications from some really poor quality recordings, 
I am much more supportive of the intent of the amateur recordists, rather than critical of their 
recording skills. I do think that if one uses the controls properly on a smartphone and places it in 
the close viscinity of the interview subject, and makes sure the thing doesn't go out of record or 
makes all kinds of notification noises that drown out the interview, it's possible to do much better 
than the old cassette recorders could do. Some of the phones have very good mics and DSP built-in.

I just did a small-ish transfer job of oral history reels that hopefully will end up publicly 
accessible one day. Very interesting content and generally superb recording by the interviewer, so 
the net result is lifelike high-fidelity voices, the whole sense of the people speaking. I told the 
archivist in charge, this is what people covet in oral history recordings.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Calabretta" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassttes - Re: [ARSCLIST] One more sticky-shed data point - Richardson 
treated tape


Hi Tom:
I think you make a great point.  I do think it's very important for oral historians to strive for 
the best possible sound quality. At the same time, I believe capturing any recorded information is 
better than nothing. The idea of a smartphone app could simplify the recording process for many. 
Capturing - for the historical record - information that would otherwise be lost is a key element of 
the oral history process.
A number of amateur (and some professional) oral historians are intimidated or overwhelmed by the 
many equipment and recording format options available, especially in the digital era. Things were 
much simpler when the only practical choices for most projects were cassettes for original 
recordings and " open-reel tape for masters.
One important reality of the oral history process is the urgency, especially with the elderly. 
Therefore, any delays while waiting for equipment selection or the introduction of a forthcoming new 
recording format can result in a missed opportunity.  Individuals or project organizers with limited 
technical expertise or support can become stalled in their efforts while trying to decide on a 
recording format.  I've seen potential oral history projects come to a dead end because of this. So 
again, I'm with you on the idea of a smartphone app or any technology that could result in the 
creation of more and better quality oral history recordings.
On a related topic, I also feel compelled to put in a good word in defense of oral history 
recordings in general. I do know there are lots of poor quality interview recordings out there, 
including some in our collections here.  A major reason for this is that oral historians generally 
work in the field, not in a studio, which means they are often working in an unfamiliar environment, 
and one in which they have very little control.
I've conducted several hundred interviews and the vast majority were recorded in homes or workplaces 
I had never visited or seen.  Upon arriving, there is a bit of a quick scramble to decide exactly 
where to do the interview. I always look for a room or space that seems as free as possible from 
interruption or background noise.  In addition, I have also often requested that we move furniture 
for better microphone placement, turn off fans and air conditioners, etc. Good technique is very 
important and can compensate for other shortcomings; even, to some degree, the quality of the 
recording equipment.
Still, there are always variables such as the sudden operation of a gas-powered weed wacker directly 
outside of a condominium window.  My point is that field recording has its challenges and they can 
contribute to less than ideal results.  I know that in doing tape transfers or other work with oral 
histories it is frustrating to work with poor quality recordings.  I agree that oral historians 
should get the best sound they can and there is often room for improvement. Still, the oral history 
process isn't a simple matter. In addition to having a comfort level with recording equipment, 
interviewers need to have a good knowledge and understanding of the subject matter and often have to 
deal with narrators who are un-talkative, uncooperative, or even intimidating. Then there are the 
chatty spouses, cuckoo clocks, barking dogs, and the occasional weed wacker.
Fred



Fred Calabretta

Curator of Collections

& Oral Historian



MYSTIC SEAPORT

The Museum of America and the Sea

75 Greenmanville Avenue

PO Box 6000

Mystic CT   06355-0990  USA



tel: 860.572.0711  ext. 5168

fax: 860.572.5313

[log in to unmask]

http://www.mysticseaport.org





-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 
Tom Fine
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassttes - Re: [ARSCLIST] One more sticky-shed data point - Richardson 
treated tape



I keep hoping someone, like Storycorps, will create a smartphone app for capturing oral histories.

The app would include a step-by-step about where to place the phone, and a little super-simple and 
large-button recorder control. Maybe also a way to directly upload the oral history to Storycorps or 
Archive.org or some other appropriate venue. I really think the emphasis should be audio-only, 
because video makes a wide swath of people nervous and thus they clinch up on answering questions or 
any other participation in the interview. The beauty of putting a phone on a table, hitting record 
and talking is that it's super-unobtrusive, even less so than a 70s cassette recorder. The goal 
would be a friendly app that is made for people with no technical experience, particularly family 
members who want to get the old-timers voices and stories before they pass on. I think it would be a 
very popular app.



-- Tom Fine

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager