LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME Archives

BIBFRAME Archives


BIBFRAME@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME Home

BIBFRAME  January 2016

BIBFRAME January 2016

Subject:

Re: The Future of Linked Data in Libraries: Assessing BIBFRAME Against Best Practices

From:

James Weinheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:45:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

On 1/24/2016 5:56 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> I think you're looking at the wrong events. Or looking at events 
> wrong. The AV modeling study has much better examples of when events 
> matter, and it appears that those for whom they matter are already 
> recording them in their data. I highly recommend reading that study 
> before this thread goes further off the rails.
>
> http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/pdf/bibframe-avmodelingstudy-may15-2014.pdf 
>

I don't think the discussion has gone so far off the rails, but thanks 
for pointing this out. I think people are gaining something out of it. 
After looking at the report it seems as if the events wanted are 
primarily for individual audio/video performances of various types, so 
the other types of events I discussed are of less importance for this 
thread.

In this particular case, this makes the entire issue much easier than 
what I had discussed. Since library catalogs do not currently encode 
this type of performance information, it becomes a case of a "blank 
slate". Therefore, Bibframe should be free to reuse any other 
event/performance types of RDF that already exists, and there seem to be 
some out there now to choose from. This is normal and shows an advantage 
of linked data and how it should be done, for all of the reasons 
mentioned in the talk pointed out by Martynas. 
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-U-Qd37WgE)

It makes much more sense in all kinds of ways to use other standards 
when they exist, and if those standards need to be supplemented in some 
ways, that can be done through additions to your own name space.

The issue of whether catalogers should encode this type of performance 
information is beyond the scope of Bibframe and enters the area of user 
needs, cataloging rules, management, staffing, training, etc. etc.

James Weinheimer [log in to unmask]
First Thus http://blog.jweinheimer.net
First Thus Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/FirstThus
Personal Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/james.weinheimer.35
Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JamesWeinheimer
Cooperative Cataloging Rules http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/
Cataloging Matters Podcasts http://blog.jweinheimer.net/cataloging-matters-podcasts
The Library Herald http://libnews.jweinheimer.net/

[delay +30 days]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager