LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  February 2016

ARSCLIST February 2016

Subject:

Re: The new normal - "hits" are hard to come by, the vinyl niche continues to thrive

From:

Dennis Rooney <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:23:28 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (360 lines)

Some best-quality examples: Victor discs pressed from 'Z' material in the
mid thirties; French and German Electrola pressings; U.S. Columbia discs
from the same period. (Their metalwork was at its finest from 1934-39, then
fell off steeply afterward.); Prewar German Telefunken and DGG, Prewar
Japanese pressings on Nippon Columbia and Nippon Polydor; Prewar Australian
pressings; English Decca FFRR discs never played with fibre or steel
needles (unfortunately, rarely found except in unplayed stocks); to name a
few. Of course, the disc is presumed to be unworn, carefully handled and
properly stored. The addition of vinyl and similar compounds to the shellac
biscuit after WW2 did improve disc noise; however, it was often vitiated by
poor metalwork and pressing quality, not to mention the compressor-ridden
recording techniques employed by RCA Victor in the lead, and the dreadful
post-production dubs of Columbia 78 rpm masters from the lacquer originals. *Au
fond*, there seem to be too many members of this list who labor under the
error that vinyl can be "cut". Only the lacquer master is cut (unless you
do DMM), the vinyl disc is invariably pressed. It's a boneheaded error
along the same line as referring to a Columbia Royal Blue pressing as "blue
wax".

DDR

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Dennis:
>
> What do you consider the "best quality examples"? I'm all ears! Let's be
> clear that my comments were about the shellac mass media. Since I'm a fan
> of a lot of pre-LP jazz, I have a lot of reissue products made from metal
> parts and lacquers, which are definitely lower noise and usually have less
> scratchy distortion than the release media. But again, I was talking about
> shellac mass-market release media. I will stick with my point that due to
> inherent lack of high end and monophonic by nature, 78s are less high
> fidelity to the source than well recorded stereophonic LPs pressed on good
> vinyl, but will agree that there's plenty of listenable, enjoyable music
> out there that originated in that era (the best of which, to my taste, has
> been expertly transferred from lacquers or metal parts and restored with
> tasteful craft rather than a brute-force approach).
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Rooney" <
> [log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 3:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The new normal - "hits" are hard to come by, the
> vinyl niche continues to thrive
>
>
> Tom Fine's comments re 78s suggest he perhaps hasn't listened to the best
>> quality examples of the format. No sane person would make any claims for
>> audio superiority, especially since all 78s are monophonic. However,
>> wide-range *per se* is not as crucial as low distortion, good cutting and
>> intelligent record EQ. Noise is both variable and relative: some discs are
>> noisy, others amazingly quiet given the material. What is not debatable is
>> their superior survival when stored in an environment that does not need
>> to
>> be more scientifically controlled beyond ensuring reasonably stable
>> conditions.The best of them will remain a pleasure to hear for an
>> indefinite period, presuming both their physical survival and a method
>> with
>> which to reproduce them.
>>
>> DDR
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 78s are quite brittle and breakable, so long-lasting only if carefully
>>> stored and used. And, no offense to any of the fans on list here, but
>>> they
>>> are hardly high fidelity to their source. Everything from the recording
>>> system (frequency-limited, essentially no top end, very high noise floor,
>>> most of this caused by the cutting elements and methods because Nick
>>> Bergh
>>> has demonstrated that what hit the cutterhead was actually pretty high
>>> fidelity although treble-lacking, as early as the early 1930s) to the
>>> release medium (commercial shellac was almost always very noisy, variable
>>> from unbearably noisy to too noisy for comfortable listening) were
>>> stacked
>>> against high fidelity. LPs got closer, especially as the technology
>>> evolved
>>> (less distortion in the cutting chains, quieter vinyl compounds).
>>>
>>> As one who has had a hand in selecting content for modern LP reissue
>>> projects, and approved test pressings, I can say that the quality level
>>> of
>>> both the cutting and pressing is very impressive. It's still a craft, but
>>> I'm happy to say there are craftsmen out there, here and now.
>>>
>>> Because it's a luxury-priced niche, much more attention CAN be paid at
>>> the
>>> factory (but not always is) to matters like plating and pressing quality,
>>> vinyl compounds and sleeve printing. It's not a mass medium like days of
>>> yore, so it doesn't need to be manufactured to the most cost-cut point to
>>> be competitive. I maintain that many buyers of modern vinyl are buying a
>>> physical artifact, something consider beautiful and collectable, and that
>>> is why they niche will remain healthy. The mass market either wants to
>>> pay
>>> nothing for music, or wants to pay very little for something that is very
>>> convenient and instantaneous, which is why vinyl will always be a niche.
>>> What has made me happy in the past decade or so is that the niche has
>>> emerged as big enough to be viable and have some economies of scale. The
>>> fact that new and refurb presses are still coming on-line, and the fact
>>> that I know there is a 3-month wait to get something pressed in any
>>> quantity right now, tells me the niche is very healthy and the economy
>>> has
>>> room to scale up a little bit (but not overbuild). I also know that the
>>> really good cutting engineers are booked months ahead too.
>>>
>>> As for the usual disdain about the low-tech nature of LP records vs a
>>> modern digital chain, my ears tell me all I need to know. If more CDs and
>>> other digital products sounded better, I'd be standing in the back row,
>>> hook-horns raised, in agreement. But, alas, too many CDs, especially
>>> remasters of content originally put out on LP, sound awful. That's not
>>> the
>>> fault of the technology, but it is the state of the art for at least
>>> those
>>> albums, since one can't buy a better-sounding product except the LP. When
>>> there is a better-sounding CD or high-rez digital alternative, I favor
>>> that
>>> as my listening source.
>>>
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Bishop" <
>>> [log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 12:55 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The new normal - "hits" are hard to come by, the
>>> vinyl niche continues to thrive
>>>
>>>
>>> 78s weren't ever pure shellac, which is too brittle, there were all kinds
>>>
>>>> of fillers in them, like later vinyl records. Many post-war 78s were
>>>> made
>>>> with vinyl compounds. But I'm sure the best shellac discs hold up very
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> Properly-produced vinyl is a very stable medium and a cheap material
>>>> too.
>>>> I
>>>> don't know how long a record could remain an accurate document sitting
>>>> on
>>>> a
>>>> library shelf - a few hundred years, a thousand? Maybe archives should
>>>> purchase some lathes and start training people to master and cut vinyl.
>>>> It
>>>> may be a better option than digital for long-term preservation - or at
>>>> least the best physical backup available.
>>>>
>>>> Artists who record digitally and upload to bandcamp or soundcloud will
>>>> more
>>>> likely than not have their music be inaccessible in a hundred years,
>>>> while
>>>> those who produce vinyl albums or singles, whatever the aural
>>>> shortcomings,
>>>> will see theirs survive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Frank Strauss <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Diamond Disks!
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Chris Bishop <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Most people don't even want downloads let alone CDs. So in that sense
>>>>> vinyl
>>>>> > is as doomed as every other physical medium.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > But I disagree that vinyl is a dead medium at this time. The DJ scene
>>>>> is
>>>>> > stronger than ever in every genre.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Records produced 50 or 60 years ago can be pulled off the shelf,
>>>>> cleaned
>>>>> > and played with almost no deterioration from age. What medium is more
>>>>> > stable in average storage conditions?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Chris
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:28 AM, John Haley <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > It's the old question--do you want fame or money?  Many "artists"
>>>>> of
>>>>> > today
>>>>> > > apparently keep their day jobs and go for fame by giving it away,
>>>>> > thinking
>>>>> > > fortune will follow.  Seems like it seldom does, and this has very
>>>>> little
>>>>> > > to do with basic talent.  It's a recipe for a lousy pop music
>>>>> world,
>>>>> > which
>>>>> > > to my ancient ears is just what is happening.  Meanwhile any
>>>>> third-rate
>>>>> > pop
>>>>> > > artist from the past can sell out a hall today.   Thank goodness
>>>>> they
>>>>> are
>>>>> > > there.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > As for vinyl, it's a blip and a fad.  If it gets people listening
>>>>> who
>>>>> > > otherwise wouldn't be, then fine, I like it, but we who ought to
>>>>> know
>>>>> > > better mustn't kid ourselves.  As a format, vinyl is a dead one,
>>>>> and
>>>>> it
>>>>> > > deserves to be.  Of course I'm not tossing out my record
>>>>> collection,
>>>>> but
>>>>> > as
>>>>> > > a person who restores old records in modern formats, I have no
>>>>> nostalgic,
>>>>> > > romantic illusions about vinyl's supposed virtues.  If people are
>>>>> happy
>>>>> > > listening to it, then be happy and go for it. But as "audio people"
>>>>> let's
>>>>> > > not go fooling ourselves.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Best,
>>>>> > > John Haley
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Tom Fine <
>>>>> [log in to unmask]>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > Interesting stats from Nielsen:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/22/10816404/2015-album-sales-trends-vinyl-catalog-streaming
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Soundscan does not pick up the whole market, but the trends seem
>>>>> > > credible.
>>>>> > > > Interesting that Adele fans are also vinyl fans in such a
>>>>> pronounced
>>>>> > > way. I
>>>>> > > > wonder if the back-catalog trend was just a blip because so much
>>>>> of
>>>>> it
>>>>> > is
>>>>> > > > now in print either as downloads or physical media, just about
>>>>> every
>>>>> > > > "golden age" audiophile favorite is not out in new-remaster
>>>>> vinyl,
>>>>> and
>>>>> > > what
>>>>> > > > CDs are left in the pipeline are heavily discounted. But, that
>>>>> said,
>>>>> > the
>>>>> > > > market to create great new music is not really there -- artists
>>>>> make
>>>>> > more
>>>>> > > > just touring and releasing a song here and there via download or
>>>>> video
>>>>> > > > streams. So why get in a studio and create great art? There was
>>>>> also
>>>>> an
>>>>> > > > interesting interview in the latest issue of TapeOp magazine with
>>>>> the
>>>>> > > > Minneapolis hip-hop collective Doomtree. One thing they said that
>>>>> stuck
>>>>> > > in
>>>>> > > > my mind is that there is a penalty today for taking the time to
>>>>> write
>>>>> > > > great, meaningful lyrics. The music-buying public wants catchy
>>>>> phrases
>>>>> > > and
>>>>> > > > well-worn stereotype statements set to music, they want simple
>>>>> ditties,
>>>>> > > and
>>>>> > > > simple sells.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > This report looks at unit sales for the first half of 2015:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/us-album-sales-fall-4-in-first-half-of-2015-as-cd-rules-market-just/
>>>>> > > > The problem that isn't documented in unit sales is that copyright
>>>>> > owners,
>>>>> > > > artists and everyone else with a stake in making quality music
>>>>> get
>>>>> > > pennies
>>>>> > > > on the dollar from these streaming services, and that's the main
>>>>> growth
>>>>> > > > area as far as consumer uptake (yes, the vinyl niche is thriving,
>>>>> but
>>>>> > > it's
>>>>> > > > a tiny niche compared to overall music sales, and does not
>>>>> produce
>>>>> > enough
>>>>> > > > revenue to float any artist or major copyright owner). I think it
>>>>> was
>>>>> > > very
>>>>> > > > foolish for the record companies to surrender to streamers on the
>>>>> > cheap.
>>>>> > > > They should be charging royalties like radio, plus a download
>>>>> fee,
>>>>> and
>>>>> > > the
>>>>> > > > streamers should be forced into a model where everyone who
>>>>> streams
>>>>> > pays a
>>>>> > > > monthly fee. Most of the streaming is freebie streaming, and that
>>>>> just
>>>>> > > > doesn't produce enough revenue. If I were an artists, I'd say you
>>>>> get
>>>>> > > > nothing for free streaming, and if I'm a hit-making artist I'd
>>>>> say
>>>>> you
>>>>> > > get
>>>>> > > > nothing without paying me regular download fees.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > -- Tom Fine
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Frank B Strauss, DMD
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> 1006 Langer Way
>> Delray Beach, FL 33483
>> 212.874.9626
>>
>>
>>


-- 
1006 Langer Way
Delray Beach, FL 33483
212.874.9626

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager