Great! Glad I asked. Thanks everyone. Sorry if I missed a similar discussion when the list was started. I delayed my subscription.
Sent from OWA on Android
________________________________________
From: ARSC Library and Archives Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:04:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIB] was Zappa, now email conundrum
Karl, there's a setting on the listserv to fix that. This list was set up with that message that
your message went through as the default, rather than you receiving a copy of your message when the
rest of the list does. Just sign into the listserv and it's easily fixed.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl E. Fitzke" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIB] was Zappa, now email conundrum
Thanks for the confirmation. I seem to only receive an email telling me my message went out to
everyone on the list, but not see what I sent in my client InBox from the list. I only see my own
clients record in my Sent folder.
It's probably some cockpit error on my part. Sorry to make it everyone's problem here, but perhaps
someone has a clue or is experienced something similar and we'll figure it out together. Thanks.
I'm going to take this off the list from this point forward though, to no longer be a bother to the
whole group. Have a great weekend, all!
________________________________________
From: ARSC Library and Archives Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Lou Judson
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 11:18:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIB] zappa Them or Us and clarification to email I sent yesterday
Karl, your posts definitely show up!
see below:
On Apr 29, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Karl E. Fitzke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 1.
> Thanks for prompting a "Them or Us" book title correction, Lou. "Us and Them"? I must have had a
> momentary short between the Pink Floyd and Frank Zappa sections of my brain - I’ve always been
> aware of the correct book title.
I googled it, did not know the correction until that showed up, in Italian!
>
> 2.
> Most importantly, I want to clarify something I said yesterday...."Sounds like Frank was getting a
> little fed up with behavior that he found oppressive, despite being able to get haircut. And yet
> he could seem at times to marginalize people in songs based on their sexuality, something we can’t
> change about ourselves."
But today we can change our sexiality - or at least our gender… But I would not say he had the power
to marginalize them/us/anyone - just to mock and be sarcastic. That is part of the artists’ job!
Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy did the same thing, couched in hugely popular humor. Same with the
Simpsons, etc. etc. etc.
>
>
> Add to that, “Anyway, we shouldn't even have to entertain thoughts of changing our sexuality (as
> if we even would if we could) or changing our hairstyle to have access to the same rights and
> responsibilities that everyone else has."
True indeed. We SHOULD be able to change things according to our inner beings, and not be penalized
for that, which speaks to the NC laws.
In the 60s and 70s I grew my hair long, but it just wasn’t comfortable, even though it represented
my cultural ideas and mindset. So I kept it short. But still I was a California Hippie…
>
> 3.
> Lou, grab a copy of “Lumpy Money” from zappa.com if you don't have one already.
<http://www.amazon.com/Lumpy-Money-Project-Object/dp/B003RF84TO> I couldn’t find it on the zappa.com
site.
I don’t have it, but I doubt I will be investing $140 in it for just a listen or two. Beatles
remasters, yes, Zappa nostalgia, not so much. But thanks!
> 4.
> I don't see any of my own posts to this list. Weird, but I ‘ll try to figure that out.
See my first line. Maybe check your junk mail?
Thanks!
<L>
>
>
> -Karl
|