Is it correct to assume that the eq used by a given company at a given time, on ethat made its own phonographs,
When a record company also made phonographs, as so many of them did through the late 340s anyhow, is it safe to assume that the non-adjustable playback eq hard-wired into the playback amplifier matched what was used to make that company's records at the time the amplifier schematic was drawn up? And, if so, could these schematics be a source of accurate playback curves for that company at that time?
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dennis Rooney
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 12:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] The best of YouTube?
In fact, what emerged as the RIAA playback curve was one of those originally published by Western Electric and used occasionally by Victor, Columbia and HMV in the late twenties. However, it was used far less than those customarily associated with 78rpm playback
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Of course it is standard procedure to not use RIAA curve on 78s. It
> should go without saying! It is only for Lps, and not all of those…
> <L> Lou Judson Intuitive Audio
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 2:03 AM, Inigo Cubillo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > During many years I did direct tape transfers of 78s, with no eq,
> > and I always noticed a better sound from
> > tapes than thru the RIAA amp, for the RIAA spoiled the sound due to
> > its
> > while the sound on the tapes was direct from the ceramic cart. Years
> > I learned about eq for 78s and I realised this was the reason of
> > better sound on the tapes.
> > Saludos,
> > Inigo
1006 Langer Way
Delray Beach, FL 33483