LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2016

ARSCLIST June 2016

Subject:

Re: Analysis of failing tapes - What do you want tested?

From:

Corey Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:28:20 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

Hi Richard,

Thank you for taking on this project. If there is anything I can 
contribute from the Left Coast, please let me know.

Three questions immediately come to mind which could lead to some testing:

Why do some audio tape formulations seem to last the test of time and 
other formulations are (almost) guaranteed to be SS? Generally, those 
tapes that are guaranteed to be SS are much newer formulations.

Does the back-coating of those tapes that are back-coated contribute to 
tape degradation? There has been some testing , mostly by Charles 
Richardson, that suggests that the back-coating may lead to SS over time.

Why are we now seeing evidence of SS with digital audio (and some DV) 
tapes? These formulations and manufacturing procedures are completely 
different than analog audio tape.

Cheers!

Corey
Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
www.baileyzone.net

On 6/1/2016 9:59 AM, Richard L. Hess wrote:
> I am cross-posting this to all three ARSC lists to throw a wide net, 
> but PLEASE let's continue the discussion on the main ARSC list or by 
> email to me directly, preferably at [log in to unmask]
>
> Recently, I have been in discussions with a group who has analytical 
> equipment that might be useful for analyzing tape degradation, and 
> they appear interested in running some tests. We may not need massive 
> amounts of testing. A few well-thought out tests may be of immense 
> assistance.
>
> Benoit Thiebaut of the Prestospace project ran a test for my 2008 
> paper which presented evidence that there was no loss of lubricant in 
> tapes--the lubricant was still there, but yet the tape squealed. This 
> led to a test by Ric Bradshaw at the IBM tape lab in Tucson showing a 
> low glass transition temperature for a squealing tape (about 8 °C). 
> These helped in the understanding of why cold playback and D5 
> lubrication both could be used to stop squealing.
>
> The first step is for all of us to chime in about what we think needs 
> to be analyzed.
>
> Here is the first one:
>
> I have great concern for the apparent increase in binder-base adhesion 
> failure. This is happening with both acetate and polyester base films.
>
> We should be aware of Tom Fine's conjecture that the dry (and cold) 
> storage recommended for (and apparently good for) polyester base film 
> tapes may be drying out and damaging acetate base film tapes.
>
> We should also be aware that Ric Bradshaw has suggested that baking 
> tapes may lead to binder-base adhesion failure. And, of course we need 
> to remember that one never bakes an acetate tape.
>
> What do YOU want tested?
>
> The second step will be to collect samples for analysis. Apparently 
> 25-50 mm of material is adequate (smaller can be used). For separating 
> tapes both separated and non-separated samples would be useful. 
> Metadata is important to understand context and should include as much 
> of the following as is known: manufacturer, type, date of manufacture, 
> presumed storage conditions over time, any known treatments, 
> observations at time of playback, and anything you can think of that 
> might be useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager