LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2016

ARSCLIST June 2016

Subject:

Edison vertical cut experiment

From:

Mickey Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:32:13 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (82 lines)

A problem with Edison vertical cuts is the rumble. I have tried a solution 
that seems to work. I use a Pickering tone arm that has a very low mass 
assembly to hold the cartridge. I found that playing an Edison slow at 331/3 
would  degrade the bass response of the record unless I introduced a 
temporary modification by adding a small weight (a dime) to increase the 
mass of the cartridge, adjusting the balance spring to give normal tracking 
pressure. The added mass allows a slow transfer. At slow speed, the 
cartridge is allowed to follow the irregularities reducing the rumble and it 
seems to make the stylus track the record far better.

I am working on a three disc set of Edison Dance bands from 1915 - 1928 from 
Diamond Discs and one Needle Cut from B.A.Rolfe - Usually one example from 
each band as I have quite a few Edison records.

I intend to post a list of the tracks when I've finalized the track 
list-Mickey





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Judson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Replies: Reply to vs. Reply all


> Wel, Paul, I have been on dozens of e-lists for 20 years, and ALL of them 
> except this one are reply-to-the-list, not to he individual. Your mileage 
> may differ, but that is “normal” to me for public lists. I’d prefer to 
> specify when I want to reply privately, and assume that a reply to a list 
> posting is for the list, not the individual.
>
> But ”reply” and “reply all” do not apply when there is only one reply-to 
> address provided by the senders.
>
> If it is not of general interest, it should not be on the list, excepting 
> some types of messages… like how can one contact so-and-so, whatever.
>
> Oh well, there is no way to please everyone. I’ll be more circumspect.
>
> <L>
> Lou Judson
> Intuitive Audio
> 415-883-2689
>
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Paul Jackson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> (And your reply to is set to go to  you, not the list. Kind of annoying.)
>>
>> I'm not sure why one should set the "Reply to" as that then would require 
>> us all, to have to reply to all of the lists we are subscribed too, when 
>> some of the information we are replying is personal to the respondent and 
>> would not be of any interest...and shouldn't be part of putting everyone 
>> on the list on notice of a personal note to someone.
>>
>> Most useful email clients have a button for "Reply" and "Reply all" and 
>> is easy to achieve without having to set the client for "All" all the 
>> time.
>> If this isn't the case, adding ARSCLIST to the reply address doesn't seem 
>> that consequential.
>>
>> I've seen a number of persons suggest we are doing this wrongly, but it's 
>> not how most handle their emails. I'm signed up for many lists as a 
>> mentor, and some things are just not appropriate for everyone to read.
>>
>> -- 
>> Paul T. Jackson
>> Trescott Research
>> Steilacoom, WA
>> [log in to unmask]
>> trescottresearch.com
>>     support writing: Plateauareawriters.org
>>     support live music: Gatewayconcertband.org
> 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager