LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB Archives

FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB  August 2016

FEDLIB August 2016

Subject:

Sharing responses and more information about SITE intelligence Group

From:

"Greene, Joyce Ms CIV" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Federal Librarians Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:11:48 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

Hello to everyone!

I wanted to get back to this group to say thanks for all who responded to to my query about SITE Intelligence Group services and also to report the responses I received. 

Basically, there were mixed reviews on SITE Intelligence Group (mainly negative) and two suggested alternatives.  The alternatives are TRAC - Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium database < http://www.trackingterrorism.org/> and the IHS Jane's Terrorism & Insurgency Centre.

From SITE Intelligence Group our subscription to the Jihadist Enterprise Service includes access to Western Jihadist Reports and the full archive of the Jihadist Enterprise Service.  I recently learned about The Jihad and Terror Threat Monitor, which is produced by MEMRI - The Middle East Media Research Institute, and appear to be very similar to those of SITE, and wondered how it compared to the SITE reports, but MEMRI wasn't mentioned in the responses. 

Finally, I received an interesting article, "The Next Frontier: Federal Librarians and Data," which I thought was useful and worth sharing.  I do find it increasingly important for librarians to develop skills in documenting, managing and analyzing data related to the resources and services acquired and maintained by the library on behalf of our organizations/customers. I know that in order to do this job well I will have to improve my data management skills and also learn how to create data management plans.  I have copied/pasted the article below.

Once again, thank you all for sharing your knowledge and taking the time to respond to my query.  

Kind regards,
Joyce


Joyce C. Greene
Chief Librarian
Marshall Center Research Library
George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies
Unit 24502, APO, AE 09053
Phone: +049-8821-750-2808
Email: [log in to unmask]


The Next Frontier: Federal Librarians and Data ======================================================
The challenges and opportunities of managing data are impacting librarians in the U.S. federal government. In all kinds of government agencies, librarians are taking on roles that support both researchers within their agencies and public users of the data that the agencies create.

The U.S. federal government has been preparing for these new roles. In 2011, the Library of Congress' Federal Library and Information Center Committee (FLICC) released an updated document on competencies for federal librarians that addresses data. "FLICC Competencies for Federal Librarians" defines the knowledge, skills, and abilities federal librarians need to possess. The document is used to develop job descriptions, train employees, and align the librarian's role with an agency's strategic goals. It encourages the development of skills to "interpret, explain, and apply standards for data collection, management, curation, and accessibility." It also encourages applying those skills in evaluating data management plans.

In February 2013, the Obama administration issued guidance for agencies with large investments in research to develop public access plans for their publications and data. In the fiscal year 2014 federal budget, Congress put similar requirements in place for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education. In March 2014, the administration reported progress within 23 agencies on drafting those plans. Throughout this process, librarians in several of those agencies have been involved to ensure the plans will meet the needs of their users.

Delivering public access to federally funded research is just one way that federal librarians are getting involved with data today. Here are a few examples of how librarians across the federal government are engaged in data management within their agencies and departments.


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve


The research library within the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve has taken the FLICC document to heart. It has developed new positions within the library to support data acquisition and licensing. The Federal Reserve System's economists are supported by research assistants who apply their quantitative skills to real-world policy issues and to research projects.

The Federal Reserve System acquires hundreds of datasets annually, covering topics such as microlevel banking and aggregate macroeconomic time series statistics. While some of the data is accessed through commercial providers, most data-particularly very large datasets-is brought in-house and managed. The research library does not directly manage the data, but it does provide significant support to document it, its availability, and its terms of use. The research library maintains a team of both reference and technical services librarians to assist researchers in identifying, evaluating, negotiating terms for, and ultimately acquiring datasets in support of the research being conducted.

Financial and market data is expensive, and how much of it can be presented within a research paper or report is routinely regulated. Data acquisition librarians not only work to negotiate rights for what their researchers need, but they review draft reports to ensure compliance with the licensing terms of the data sources used. Licensing of specific datasets can range from acquiring a narrow slice of data for a single researcher to securing rights and access for everyone within the Board of Governors and, at times, all 12 of the independent Federal Reserve Banks across the U.S. In order to specialize in the unique requirements of the users, each data acquisition librarian is responsible for several types of research data. Examples of their specialties include banking, consumer credit, real estate, and specific industry sectors.

The cornerstone of this program is the Library Information and Data Access (LIDA) catalog of data sources and their license terms and availability. The catalog is available internally to all researchers and provides information on datasets, databases, ebooks, and industry news sources. It offers categorized descriptions to help everyone from experts to novices navigate the complicated maze of sources available for understanding financial markets and their regulation.

As a whole, the Federal Reserve System conducts monthly meetings with data librarians across its network to discuss issues, op portunities, and strategies for supporting data within the organization. The data acquisition librarians also participate in a larger group of financial data professionals within the U.S. federal government under the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC).


Making Government Data Accessible: The USGS Story


Another way in which federal librarians are getting involved with data is by taking part in communities of practice within their agencies and departments. At the USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), librarians have been participating in the Community for Data Integration (CDI;usgs.gov/cdi <http://usgs.gov/cdi> ) since 2011. The community is an open forum comprising scientists, data managers, librarians, and program managers. They share the goal of developing tools and best practices that make it easier to integrate earth science data.

Access to federal government research data used in publications is seen as a critical element of reproducibility, usability, and scientific integrity. Even prior to the series of open data initiatives introduced by the Obama administration in 2013, the USGS was working toward making its data broadly accessible for other researchers to find, access, and use.

The challenge of integrating earth science data is an ongoing issue for researchers. Data across multiple disciplines (geology, geography, biology, and hydrology, etc.) is collected, managed, and documented in very different ways. These challenges were not created to limit integration. They emerged from decades of solitary and divergent practices for gathering data and using it in the individual disciplines.

One strategy for addressing the challenges at the USGS was to establish the Data Management Working Group (DMWG). This organization works with the USGS Core Science Analytics, Synthesis, and Libraries, a program focused on data management and high-performance computing. That partnership has been a cornerstone of pushing cultural change for how USGS data is managed throughout its life cycle. DMWG launched a number of concurrent activities to support increased access to data-management tools and best practices. One of its products is a data life cycle for the USGS, described in the document, "The United States Geological Survey Science Data Lifecycle Model." Another product is the USGS Data Management website (usgs.gov/datamanagement <http://usgs.gov/datamanagement> ), which is designed around the data life cycle to provide best practices and tools for data management.

CDI is also working with the USGS Office of Science Quality and Integrity to develop foundational policies that support managing data for access and reuse. The policies address data management, metadata for describing data, software releases, and review and approval for data release. They are scheduled to be introduced early this year.

But managing data within the federal government is more than an exercise in documentation. Other efforts critical to increased data access and reusability revolve around tools and infrastructure. The USGS is deploying several innovative applications that help scientists better manage their data. ScienceBase (sciencebase.gov/catalog <http://sciencebase.gov/catalog> ) is a data-management platform that allows the uploading and cataloging of data as well as data sharing across communities. USGS is developing ScienceBase as a mechanism for the release of its official data and is working toward introducing a data-management dashboard that will incorporate a variety of tools for managing data.

Some of those tools include the Online Metadata Editor (OME; mercury-ops2.ornl.gov/OME <http://mercury-ops2.ornl.gov/OME> ), which was developed in partnership with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mercury Consortium. The OME allows researchers to create metadata records following the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM). The interface is designed to reduce the burden of knowing about the standard by asking researchers common questions about their data. Another tool, the USGS Science Data Catalog (data.usgs.gov/datacatalog <http://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog> ), launched in 2014 and provides a single point of access to USGS data. USGS researchers can contribute to the catalog through a dashboard that registers a harvest point for their metadata and provides reports on the status of records in the system. The Science Data Catalog is the USGS response to open data requirements for federal agencies and serves as a conduit to the U.S. Department of the Interior and Data.gov catalogs.


Providing Ways to Cite Data in Publications


The final example of federal librarians taking on new roles with data comes from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE's OSTI (Office of Scientific and Technical Information) employs librarians and other information scientists, making DOE research accessible to broader research communities. In 2010, it piloted a program to provide a registration service that assigns digital object identifiers (DOIs) for data produced by DOE employees, contractors, and grantees.

OSTI provides data registration as a free service to DOE organizations and projects, but also offers it to other U.S. federal agencies through interagency agreements. Member agencies using the service submit metadata either manually or by using an automated web service. Based on that submission, a DOI is created and associated with the record. The DOI and a subset of the metadata are sent automatically to DataCite, where the DOI is entered into its registry and becomes live so users around the world can cite the source data they are using in their papers. The DataCite DOI can also be used as a permanent link to the data, wherever it resides, through link-resolution services.

The adoption of systems and procedures for making research data accessible has taken time but has seen steady growth since the DOE started its pilot in 2010. The team at OSTI has seen a wider variety of projects involving data registration. In addition to DOE programs, other federal agencies are beginning to adopt the data-resolution service. One of its first non-DOE adoptions was by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to register identifiers for financial reports and data.

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is planning to register clinical data from its various databases, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service will register datasets deposited to an online repository from its many branches and projects. The USGS, in partnership with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Mercury Consortium, developed a DOI tool (mercury-ops2.ornl.gov/DOI <http://mercury-ops2.ornl.gov/DOI> ) that allows its re searchers to create identifiers for their research data collections. The tool lets data and information providers generate globally unique, persistent, and resolvable identifiers for any kind of digital object.


The Next Frontier


As the next frontier for librarians, data offers a whole host of challenges and opportunities. Well-managed data not only provides trustworthy information for analysis, but it also delivers documentation that offers context about how it was collected and what it contains. Librarians understand the value of context as well as the need to document the meanings of both individual fields and entire datasets.

As these examples illustrate, federal librarians are taking on a variety of roles in acquiring and managing data and making it accessible. While they may not be the sole providers of products and services associated with data, they are partnering with researchers, participating in teams, and demonstrating their value. The reality is that data is now an integral part of supporting the work of government.
________________________________



M i k e  M a l o n e y
4 1 0 | 5 6 2 | 9 2 5 5

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager