From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Netanel Ganin
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 5:35 PM
>
> I was unable (and am fully ready to chalk this up to bad navigational skills) to find a
> response on the RSC site to this proposal. Does anyone have any insight into
> what was the result of this proposal?
According to:
http://www.rda-rsc.org/6JSC/BL/21
"... discussion suspended pending work of FRBR Consolidation Expert Group." I haven't investigated beyond this webpage.
> 2. Follow up -- has there been a proposal (or immediate rejection of such) for fictional places such as
>
> Oz (Imaginary place)
> Never-Never Land (Imaginary place)
>
> to be entered into the NAF rather than LCSH?
Since some places are tied to governments (corporate bodies), see above. As for the remainder, I don't have time to check, but you might find something here:
http://www.rda-rsc.org/6JSC/FictitiousWG/1
There's a reference to fictitious places here:
http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Chair-10-2016.pdf
--
Mark K. Ehlert O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library
Cataloging and Metadata University of St. Thomas
Librarian 2115 Summit Avenue
Phone: 651-962-5488 St. Paul, MN 55105
<http://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/>
"Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by
the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of
Verona," Act I, Scene iii
|
