LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2017

ARSCLIST May 2017

Subject:

Re: Another copyright question

From:

John Haley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 May 2017 15:38:05 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

Copyright of songs is totally different from copyright of sound
recordings. Different copyrights, different law.

The internet has proved to be a kind of "Wild West" for copyright issues,
but Joel is right--it is not wide open "anything goes."

Best,
John


On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Joel Ackerman <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I am also a retired attorney; some experience with copyrights. Putting a
> copyrighted item on a free website is as much an infringement as selling
> it. I have a great article by Scott Adams (author of the Dilbert cartoons)
> on this point. You need to check whether the songs themselves were
> copyrighted and, if so, whether the copyrights are still in force.
>
> Joel Ackerman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Haley
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 11:47 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another copyright question
>
> I hesitate to weigh in on this topic, because it is a big one. But, with
> all due respect to Steve, everything is not under copyright. For starters,
> US federal copyright law did not exist for sound recordings until 1972, so
> there are only state law concerns regarding all such pre-1972 material. (we
> are talking only US law here). What is dubbed "state law copyright law"
> exists in only a handful of states, and it is really a branch of property
> law, not true copyright law, which is all federal. The state law is fairly
> pernicious, IMHO (I'm a retired lawyer who has studied this stuff for
> years), and in the case of NY state law, ill-founded but still there. The
> law of copyright as it pertains to recordings really needs to be
> federalized by Congress, to get rid of the patchwork of inconsistent and
> unclear state law. Given the state of Congress today, I do not look for
> anything like that to be happening anytime soon, and given what is going
> on, perhaps it is best that they don't, at least for now.
>
> The words "public domain" get misused a lot. For something to reach PD in
> the US, it must pass thru copyright protection. Pre-1972 recordings, which
> have never had any federal protection, are not in PD and cannot reach it,
> because they never were copyrighted. They are protected by neither federal
> copyright law nor PD. In general, PD has been nibbled away over the years
> such that it barely exists in the US, at least in any of our lifetimes.
>
> As for record company lawyers, my (long) experience is that very few IP
> lawyers understand much about copyright for sound recordings, and the
> easiest legal opinion to give someone is always "no," especially where the
> lawyer doesn't really know and the answers are not readily ascertainable.
> Big record companies will just take the view that they own everything in
> sight--that is plainly incorrect. And incorrect assumptions are very
> plentiful in this area.
>
> The law of the rest of the world is much, much clearer when it comes to
> copyright of sound recordings. Such law is generally covered by statute,
> and and those statutes are reasonably clear, embracing a rational approach
> to PD that is alien to our US law.
>
> Best,
> John Haley
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Gary A. Galo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > I thought that the Edison and Aeolian/Vocalion catalogs were public
> > domain, because the owners declared them to be so. My memory could be
> > faulty, also. Tim Brooks would know.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Smolian
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:45 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Another copyright question
> >
> > As far as I know, just about everything from 1877 to the present is
> > protected in one way or another. There are orphan labels with
> > uncertain ownership.
> >
> > In my opinion, putting commercial sound recordings on a web site has a
> > greater potential down than upside. Other opinions may differ.
> >
> > There is a choice to be made between what you can probably get away
> > with and the probable liabilities, should things turn nasty. People
> > do this all the time. People acting as employees of institutions are
> > putting their institutions at risk. Institutions have lawyers on
> > staff to advise. My opinion.
> >
> > Steve Smolian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:
> > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James Roth
> > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 12:53 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [ARSCLIST] Another copyright question
> >
> > Hello again
> >
> > I have an LP made by A.B.C. (J. Naftali Records). Of singer Albert
> Ortiz
> > (The Yiddish Golden Voice of)
> > I need to know if there's any chance of copyright issues.
> >
> > Might there be a list of labels that are definitely not copyrighted
> > anymore.
> > Of course, there's are the artists that might still be alive and
> > copyrighted.
> >
> > I don't intend to make copies or sell them, just to put it on a free
> > website.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ben
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager