LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  May 2017

ARSCLIST May 2017

Subject:

Re: Digital capture of 12-bit/32kHz DAT via S/PDIF (not DDS drives)

From:

Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 2 May 2017 12:39:06 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

Understood - but my experience says that the elusive quality of directm non-linear digital and then conversion will not be much better, and a whole lot more troublesome…

Plus I have a secret thought, not verified technically, that the DAT decks’ analog playback somehow compensates for the deficiencies of the A/D conversion of the day. It was a system, in my view, from analog to DAT to analog, and is not improved by direct digital playbck with modern equipment. Many of my DAT transfers were from 48k DAT analog out to A/D at 44.1., back in ye olde days of CD media. THIS century, we have much better conversion from one sample rate to another, especially with Izotope RX. I use RX5 Advanced, about to upgrade to 6…

I’m a big fan of Democracy now, but only as transcripts, having an aversion to the interview style and host voices. Great material though! I wish they were print journalists as they could do so much more coverage more economically. Purely my personal opinion, not really appropriate on this list :-)

<L>
Lou Judson
Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On May 2, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Eli Bildirici <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hey Lou and Ted,
> Appreciate it but I'm trying to avoid the quality loss, however minor, of a D-A-D conversion. Once the 12-bit files are created, resampling to a more standard format e.g. Redbook should be trivial by using a good resampler like SoX (or Izotope if you could afford it) right? In any case there is also Redbook and possibly 48kHz content on these tapes and it just seems silly to do D-A-D on those, lacking even the motive of moving to a more standardized format. I'm only even asking for this because I figured it would be beneficial to know an alternative to the preferred way of making these copies (DSS drives and ReadDAT or DATXtract). Of course if neither of these ways work out, doing a D-A-D conversion will have to do, and probably won't make much of a difference given that there is very little content here that isn't straight-up voice (we're a radio show after all). But it's still not ideal :/ In any case, thanks for chiming in.
> Regards,
> Eli
>
>> May 2 2017 2:48 PM, "Ted Kendall" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> If memory serves, the 12-bit convertors were non-linear anyway. Best to
>> convert to something civilised via analogue.
>>
>> May 2 2017 2:24 PM, "Lou Judson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Sigh, nonstandard formats are a problem!
>>
>> But as a small time archivst myself, I would take the analog outut of the deck and re-encode it at
>> 16 bit for archiving purposes. There is no way you waould actually want “bit-perfect” 12 bit files,
>> as that would just pass the problem down to your successors.
>>
>> Play the DATs, record the output in a normal format, and it will be far better than any kluge you
>> can do with 12 bit digital.
>>
>> I used Sony 12 bit 32kHz for some extended recordings back in the day, and this was the best way I
>> found for the transfer.
>>
>> I’ll be interested to see if anyone has a better suggestion!
>>
>> <L>
>> Lou Judson
>> Intuitive Audio
>> 415-883-2689
>>
>> On May 2, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Eli Bildirici <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey ARSClisters,
>>>
>>> I'm an intern in the archives department at Democracy Now! and have come across a couple hundred
>>> mixed-frequency DAT tapes, many of which have 12-bit/32kHz content on them. (And yes, this is the
>>> same issue an archivist from DN! posted about nearly ten years ago, here
>>> (http://www.cool.conservation-us.org/byform/mailing-lists/arsclist/2007/07/msg00380.html).) We'd
>>> like to make bit-perfect digital copies, but don't have a SCSI DDS drive at the moment, and in any
>>> case would like to know if there's a reliable alternative path to digitally copying DATs,
>>> especially those recorded at a bit-depth of 12, via S/PDIF and capture cards. I attempted to copy a
>>> portion of a tape recorded at Redbook rates using our main deck - a Sony PCM-R500 - with an M-Audio
>>> FireWire Solo and Audacity to record, but this was full of pops and clicks that, I assume, are the
>>> result of the M-Audio failing to lock onto the tape deck's clock. (The pops and clicks only show up
>>> during recording and are not on the tape itself. Actually, I suspect Audacity may in part be to
>>> blame, since the pops and clicks are absent when monitoring via the M-Audio control panel app on OS
>>> X...but I digress.) I've also found that external sound cards based on the C-Media CM6206 chipset -
>>> cheap and plentiful on eBay - reportedly support 16-bit/32kHz input, as does the S/PDIF input of
>>> our aging PowerMac G5. But that doesn't help us with 12-bit content, and nor do we know whether
>>> clock syncing will pose an issue and how to deal with it if it does. My suspicion is that, while
>>> there might be an economical and reliable solution to recording DAT tapes with 16-bit content (at
>>> least at 44.1 or 48 kHz sample rates) without a DDS drive, that we're out of luck for 12-bit
>>> content - but, any advice/confirmation/refutation would be most welcome.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eli
>>>
>>> Eli Bildirici
>>> (347) 837-8337
>
> Eli Bildirici
> (347) 837-8337
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager