Oh, no diagreement there! But DAT was less sophisticated thing, and 12 bit 32k makes it completely different…
My single project with DA-88 was exactly as you say, when transferred digitally it was magnificent!
On May 2, 2017, at 12:53 PM, Ellis Burman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Definitely not true with DA-88. I always thought the A/D was the weak link
> with DA-88, but once I got ProTools and captured my old tapes digitally,
> wow - what an improvement! I think the D/A may have been the weaker link
> in that case.
> Just my .02
> [log in to unmask]
> 818-846-5525 <%28818%29%20846-5525>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Plus I have a secret thought, not verified technically, that the DAT
>> decks’ analog playback somehow compensates for the deficiencies of the A/D
>> conversion of the day. It was a system, in my view, from analog to DAT to
>> analog, and is not improved by direct digital playbck with modern