๐
Need to know basis I'm afraid this time. Sorryโ.
How are you doing? Anything interesting?
ืืืจืื,
ืฉื ืืจืืจื.
ืืืืื ืืฉืืืืจ ืืืืืืืฆืื ืฉื ืืืืื ืืืืื ืืคืืื 8-35ืื
Cheers
Shai Drori
Expert digitization services for Audio Video
Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
Timeless Recordings Music Label
www.audiovideofilm.com
[log in to unmask]
Tripadvisor level 5 contributor, level 10 restaurant expert
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 7:13 PM, John Haley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Shai, I am curious--what on earth is recorded in such lo-fi with 40
> channels?
>
> Best,
> John Haley
>
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Shai Drori <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gang
> > Seeing the wisdom of the group. I am digitizing log tapes for a client.
> > Tapes are 40 tracks each generating 400GB per tape at 48kh/24bit.
> Obviously
> > there is nothing on those 15/32" IPS tapes that needs that fidielity, and
> > my client doesn't have the storage capacity for all her tapes (lot of
> > them). So the question is what format should we compress to. MP3 at
> 256KB/s
> > is one option, staying with wave but reducing the sampling to 22Khz/16bit
> > is another (not sure it's small enough), maybe even 11Khz? Other options?
> > As you can imagine the audio is worse than AM but I do want to keep it as
> > close to the original as possible. Manufacturer claims top freq at around
> > 3Khz.
> > ืืืจืื,
> > ืฉื ืืจืืจื.
> > ืืืืื ืืฉืืืืจ ืืืืืืืฆืื ืฉื ืืืืื ืืืืื ืืคืืื 8-35ืื
> > Cheers
> > Shai Drori
> > Expert digitization services for Audio Video
> > Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
> > Timeless Recordings Music Label
> > www.audiovideofilm.com
> > [log in to unmask]
> > Tripadvisor level 5 contributor, level 10 restaurant expert
> >
>
|