I believe that you're both wrong. This links to what starts with a 78 dub of
a 1947 Buddy Clark recording finishing with my current recording process -
during the vocal listen for the sound quality to change. The last half was
done with a slow transfer then speed correction in the computer. Unless a
record is worn, this process is very beneficial-Mickey Clark
https://www.dropbox.com/s/onfke6hr6ntgzow/Demo%20of%20Serenade.WAV?dl=0
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary A. Galo
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 10:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Transferring LPs at 78 RPM
Lou is absolutely right - real time is the only sensible thing to do, for
any and all media.
Gary
____________________________
Gary Galo
Audio Engineer Emeritus
The Crane School of Music
SUNY at Potsdam, NY 13676
"Great art presupposes the alert mind of the educated listener."
Arnold Schoenberg
"A true artist doesn't want to be admired, he wants to be believed."
Igor Markevitch
-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lou Judson
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 1:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Transferring LPs at 78 RPM
Why would one do that? You lose the accurate RIAA (or other) curve, and
probably damage both the groove and the stylus, plus losing the high
frequencies... Don't do it! And with the ratio of 2.34 (...) would you get
the pitch just right digitally?
I get paid by the hour, so I'd do it realtime. I transfer everything I do at
realtime...
<L>
Lou Judson
Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689
On Aug 9, 2017, at 10:15 AM, 6295LARGE . <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> If I transfer a vinyl LP at 78 RPM then slow it down to proper speed
> do I lose anything?
>
> Regards,
> Ben Roth
>
|