Oh yes I forgot the Bible. I always wonder why the AGFA PEM 468 and 469
are listed together since they are different tapes. While the 468 is an
amazing tape that holds for decades (at least the batches I worked on in
Israel), the 469 was a complete disaster. Targeted at the 456 market, it
was supposed to be 100% compatible with 456 settings. Turned out it was
ever crappier binder than the 456.
בברכה,
שי דרורי.
מומחה לשימור ודיגיטציה של אודיו וידאו ופילם 8-35ממ
Cheers
Shai Drori
Expert digitization services for Audio Video
Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
Timeless Recordings Music Label
www.audiovideofilm.com
[log in to unmask]
Tripadvisor level 5 contributor, level 10 restaurant expert
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Tim Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
> According to Richard's list, they need baking.
>
> http://richardhess.com/notes/formats/magnetic-media/magnetic
> -tapes/analog-audio/degrading-tapes/
>
> Cheers
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shai Drori" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 11:42 PM
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Scotch 226 tapes
>
>
>
> Hi Gang
>> Getting a few reels next week. Are these good tapes or SSS that need
>> baking?
>> בברכה,
>> שי דרורי.
>> מומחה לשימור ודיגיטציה של אודיו וידאו ופילם 8-35ממ
>> Cheers
>> Shai Drori
>> Expert digitization services for Audio Video
>> Hi Res scanning for film 8mm-35mm
>> Timeless Recordings Music Label
>> www.audiovideofilm.com
>> [log in to unmask]
>> Tripadvisor level 5 contributor, level 10 restaurant expert
>>
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
|