Hi Steve,
Been there, done that, many times and still occasionally use the
process. The worst thing that I encountered was the time involved. When
I use this method, I will record with the low frequency EQ, leaving the
high frequency EQ flat (everything north of the turnover point) which
allows for adequate digital headroom while leaving plenty to work with
for processing. I will mostly use this process for those records with a
considerable high frequency roll-off. After processing the hi frequency
information, I am left with the decision of adding the correct high
frequency EQ in the analog domain or the digital domain. I personally
don't like adding record EQ in the digital domain but it certainly is
faster and some can't tell the difference. There is no generation loss
because you are working with digital files and, since you still have the
original file, you can do both and compare the results.
Cheers!
Corey
Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
www.baileyzone.net
On 1/22/2018 9:07 PM, Steve Smolian wrote:
> Using 96/24 throughout, what is present thinking about converting from a digital file to analog, equalizing, and reconverting, using 2 computers and 2 converters?
>
> Steven Smolian
|