Hi Steve,

Been there, done that, many times and still occasionally use the 
process. The worst thing that I encountered was the time involved. When 
I use this method, I will record with the low frequency EQ, leaving the 
high frequency EQ flat (everything north of the turnover point) which 
allows for adequate digital headroom while leaving plenty to work with 
for processing. I will mostly use this process for those records with a 
considerable high frequency roll-off. After processing the hi frequency 
information, I am left with the decision of adding the correct high 
frequency EQ in the analog domain or the digital domain. I personally 
don't like adding record EQ in the digital domain but it certainly is 
faster and some can't tell the difference. There is no generation loss 
because you are working with digital files and, since you still have the 
original file, you can do both and compare the results.

Cheers!

Corey

Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
www.baileyzone.net

On 1/22/2018 9:07 PM, Steve Smolian wrote:
> Using 96/24 throughout, what is present thinking about converting from a digital file to analog, equalizing, and reconverting, using 2 computers and 2 converters?
>
> Steven Smolian