On 1/23/2018 5:28 AM, Ted Kendall wrote:
> Not all digital EQ exhibits the same phase characteristics as the 
> equivalent analogue network, and this is important when applyng RIAA 
> playback EQ, for example.

Some experiments I did a few years ago suggest that the parametric EQ 
and the "scientific filters" in Audition do mimic the phase 
characteristics of minimum-phase analog EQs. a quick test suggested that 
the EQs in DC-EIGHT (and presumably DC-NINE) do too. Those are only two 
programs, of course, but they offer the possibility of phase-correct 
digital de-emphasis.

Peace,
Paul

> 
> 
> On 23/01/2018 11:09, Lou Judson wrote:
>> I don�t know in the ARSC community, but in generalaudio engineering, 
>> digital EQ can be more accurate and efficient than analog, and can be 
>> done in faster than real time. Why would you want to do that, I�m 
>> curious.
>>
>> Mastering engineers do some work in analog domain, but not just simple 
>> EQ.
>>
>> <L>
>> Lou Judson
>> Intuitive Audio
>> 415-883-2689
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 9:07 PM, Steve Smolian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Using 96/24 throughout, what is present thinking about converting 
>>> from a digital file to analog, equalizing, and reconverting, using 2 
>>> computers and 2 converters?
>>>
>>> Steven Smolian
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>