Adding to my previous comment - with good convertors it is fine, and for your artistic use no problem!
Lou Judson - Intuiitive Audio
It all comes down to “Adjust All Controls For Best Sound” in the end.
On Jan 23, 2018, at 5:55 AM, Steve Smolian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This is not to adjust recording eq with itzs reciprocal playback eq.
> This would be to add subjective eq, I'm working with many orchestral 78s
> from the early electrical era. Mike placement varies so much from session
> to session that it takes a long time to adjust each set. Knowing that I can
> get back and make adjustments later, if needed, is comforting. I'm used to
> using parametrics in the analog domain to get the sound of massed strings
> "right" as that also clarifies the distinctive sounds of the solo wind
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ted Kendall
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:28 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Multiple conversions
> Not all digital EQ exhibits the same phase characteristics as the equivalent
> analogue network, and this is important when applyng RIAA playback EQ, for
> On 23/01/2018 11:09, Lou Judson wrote:
>> I don't know in the ARSC community, but in generalaudio engineering,
> digital EQ can be more accurate and efficient than analog, and can be done
> in faster than real time. Why would you want to do that, I'm curious.
>> Mastering engineers do some work in analog domain, but not just simple EQ.
>> Lou Judson
>> Intuitive Audio
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 9:07 PM, Steve Smolian <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Using 96/24 throughout, what is present thinking about converting from a
> digital file to analog, equalizing, and reconverting, using 2 computers and
> 2 converters?
>>> Steven Smolian
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.