LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIB Archives


ARSCLIB Archives

ARSCLIB Archives


ARSCLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIB Home

ARSCLIB Home

ARSCLIB  March 2018

ARSCLIB March 2018

Subject:

Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Swish

From:

Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ARSC Library and Archives Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 6 Mar 2018 17:40:38 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (59 lines)

I also find it abominable that people set their email to reply only to them. I am only interested in the list, Matthew.
Lou Judson
Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Swish
> Date: March 6, 2018 at 5:39:28 PM PST
> To: Matthew Sohn <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Sheesh! Would you cut an archival tape in little pieces 7.5Ē LONG?
>
> I find this heresy disgusting. Speed can be determined by ear. If you canít do that you are in the wrong business.
>
> But I donít do disc transfers, so why do I care? Just shocked. SHOCKED I tell you!
>
> :-) with a little bit of humor
> <L>
> Lou Judson
> Intuitive Audio
> 415-883-2689
>
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Matthew Sohn <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> George said: "The good click-removers we have now have also enabled me to suggest that a
>> radial scratch be made on every original shellac record side before archival
>> transfer."Sounds like heresy, but I understand the reasoning. Perhaps a transfer before the defacing as well? The scratch would have to be in a straight line, not hand-drawn, and hopefully as light as possible.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 6:43 PM, George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
>>
>>
>> Hello all Swish-removers,
>>
>> to me Swish is an important authenticator. I have used the swish in a
>> commercial transfer to find out that the record was transferred at 78 rpm,
>> rather than the 70 that ought to have been used. If it had been cleaned up, I
>> would not have had this short-cut to prove malpractice.
>>
>> The good click-removers we have now have also enabled me to suggest that a
>> radial scratch be made on every original shellac record side before archival
>> transfer. The use copy may then have the click removed. The archival transfer
>> will in itself show one of the most important parameters in transfer.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>>
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager