LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIB Archives


ARSCLIB Archives

ARSCLIB Archives


ARSCLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIB Home

ARSCLIB Home

ARSCLIB  March 2018

ARSCLIB March 2018

Subject:

Re: [ARSCLIST] RX5, etc.

From:

Corey Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ARSC Library and Archives Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:02:04 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

Hi Lou,

As stated on my website (http://www.baileyzone.net/services.htm) I only 
perform restoration processing on a copy of the 44.1 file. The original 
transfers are left intact. Since I do transfers for institutions as well 
as individuals, the original transfers are used for archival. The 
process of creating two files simultaneously takes no extra time and 
there is no extra cost involved.

Cheers!

Corey

Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
www.baileyzone.net

On 3/5/2018 9:03 AM, Lou Judson wrote:
> Paul is correct. SRC is math intensiove no matter the ratio. 88.2 to 44.1 is no simpler than 96 to 44.1.
>
> Yes, you are out of date, sadly. RX does wonderful conversion. 96k down to 44.1 almost sounds better than recorded originally at 44.1 hard as that may seem.
>
> Old folks donít need to use old methods! (Iím 68 so that is not a directed statement!)
>
> But yes, avoiding conversion at all is good, but nearly impossible if you have multiple delivery destinations (24/96 archival, 16/44.1 CD, mp3 of any kind.)
>
> Recording them separately means that if you do any processing (even simple level change) the diffreent files will not be the same. I do all processing at 24/96 then make the versions needed.
>
> <L>
> Lou Judson
> Intuitive Audio
> 415-883-2689
>
> On Mar 4, 2018, at 10:34 PM, Paul Stamler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/4/2018 11:32 PM, Corey Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> Call me old fashioned, but I will not sample rate convert unless it is in even mathematical numbers (88.2K to 44.1K, 96K to 48K, etc.). On my website, I state that I digitize to 2 files simultaneously because I'm not a fan of sample rate conversion. Yes, I know that algorithms have improved over the years and those of you that maintain that you can't hear any difference will not change my opinion on this.
>> My understanding is that sample conversion with even mathematical ratios (like 2:1) is just as destructive as with non-even ratios (like 96:44.1), and my (strictly-anecdotal, not-scientific) listening experience tells me the same thing, so I try to avoid *any* sample rate conversion.
>>
>> Peace,
>> Paul
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager