LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2018

ARSCLIST June 2018

Subject:

Re: Processing micro cassette audio using iZotope RX5

From:

Ellis Burman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Jun 2018 20:44:55 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (168 lines)

I agree with Tom Gillett.  The adaptive mode of the RX denoiser takes quite
a bit of time to settle in, and can often over or under process the first
few words of a sentence before it settles.  Especially since the noise is
fairly consistent in your case, you should use the manual mode and "learn"
the noise between sentences.  This will give a more consistent and
effective result than the adaptive mode.

The de-hum in RX is terrible.  The notch filters ring like mad.  I love RX,
but that is one feature of it that I find unusable.  Luckily, we have Cedar
here, which is crazy expensive, but works like magic, with few artifacts.
If RX is all you have, I'd be very careful using the de-hum.  I'd use it as
lightly as possible and listen carefully for the ringing filters.  If you
have an FIR EQ with a high enough Q, you might be better off using a few
bands of that, instead of RX de-hum.  Be careful removing tones with the
spectral editor too.  If you select a long, narrow frequency band and
attenuate it a lot, it will also ring (and pre-ring!) like mad.

You should be able to look at the waveform and determine if the clipping
distortion is playback related.  If the clipping is perfectly horizontal,
then it happened on playback, so reducing the volume should help.  If the
distortion is not horizontal and looks more embedded into the waveform,
then it likely happened during the recording.

My thoughts on de-noise -  The human brain is very adept at hearing through
noise, so I've found that removing the noise doesn't help with
intelligibilty, and often artifacts the audio, making intelligibility even
worse.  De-noise is often the most damaging and abused restoration process,
so I'd use it very judiciously, if at all.  It can definitely make a track
more listenable, but I have yet to hear it make a track more intelligible.
The human brain is a much more powerful de-noise processor than any plug-in!

Ellis


On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Tim Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for uploading the unprocessed audio sample. That really helps. Your
> azimuth alignment seems pretty  good. There's a
> bit of azimuth wander but that's to be expected with a slow speed
> microcassette track.
>
> Automatic solutions are not ideal. The best approach is to identify each
> particular type of unwanted noise in
> the recording and then attempt to remove each of them, one at a time, with
> a dedicated tool.
> So with that in mind...
>
> 1. Hum.
> There's a mild hum with a fundamental of around 149 Hz and a total of four
> or maybe five harmonics above that. Probably caused by the cassette
> recorder's motor
> and transport. I was able to greatly remove them with my  Acon DeHum tool.
>
> With similar settings you should be able to do the same in RX Dehum.
>
> 2. Random noise.
> Unfortunately the hum is not the main issue. As you mentioned there's a
> lot of
> random noise, and worse of all, right in the critical voice band. That  is
> the worst
> kind to remove, often impossible.  My approach is always to filter out
> everything below the
> lowest recorded speech frequency, and above the highest.  In this case I
> low pass filtered at about 300
> Hz,  and  high pass filtered at about 3000Hz, both with a Q of about 5.
> It gave a mild improvement in listenability without degrading the wanted
> voice.
>
> Your Corrective EQ tool sounds like the equivalent tool in RX.
>
> 3.Clipping.
> I hear some sort of ugly distortion  on voice peaks.  Its
> spectrum  goes up to at least 10kHz. I doubt it's on the
> microcassette tape. Possibly when you transferred, the playback volume on
> the GE was too high and
> it was clipping its internal amplifier. Try lowering the GE's playback
> volume to  where the clipping stops. But dont go too low as there may be a
> low level noise from the GE's amplifier (the hum?) which you want the
> tape's own
> content to mask. Somewhere in the middle is usually the best.
>
>
> You might try RX's Declipping tool but as mentioned I would first check
> the distortion isnt caused by the playback/recording chain.
>
> 4.  I didnt  attempt to use a Denoiser/Dialogue Denoiser and that was
> intentional.
>
> Hope this helps Dan,
>
> Tim Gillett
> Perth,
> Western Australia
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Gediman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 11:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Processing micro cassette audio using iZotope RX5
>
>
> Thanks, everyone for all your input so far. Some info that might help
> clarify things. The unit I’m using is a GE micro cassette tape
> player/record, NOT a mini cassette. Second, removing the tape and
> transferring it to a standard cassette is not an option here, as I have to
> return these tapes as is to their owner. Lastly, the unit has a mono
> mini-plug earphone jack and the recording itself is mono. And I’ve already
> adjusted the azimuth to the best of my ability using my ear. I don’t have
> access to a meter to check precisely (unless someone can suggest a software
> meter that would work).
>
> As far as RX5, I have used the De-noise module in spectral mode, feeding
> it a sample of the background noise. It has made it substantially better,
> but I’m trying to see if I can make it ever better. I also experimented
> with the presents of the corrective EQ module. I haven’t tried the Spectral
> Repair option, because frankly I’m not sure how to use it properly. If you
> think it could help, I’ll go online and find some tutorial videos to bring
> me up to speed. Ditto for any of the other RX5 modules that you think might
> help (de-clipping has been suggested, as has de-reverb).
>
> Since I assume most of you have upgraded to RX6, here are the available
> tools in my version of RX5:
>
> De-clip
> De-click
> De-hum
> De-noise
> Spectral Repair
> De-reverb
> Gain
> Corrective EQ
> Channel Ops
> Resample
> Dither
>
> Someone asked if I could upload an audio sample. I’m not sure how to do
> that in a listserv, so I have uploaded a raw, unprocessed sample to Google
> Drive here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NuYkyKK6yNXzDRtOA_ZUHuYzf6
> VCAwuK <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NuYkyKK6yNXzDRtOA_ZUHuYzf6VCAwuK>.
> Anything else you think I should try, hearing the file and knowing what I
> have already tried?
>
> Thanks again!
> Dan
>
> Dan Gediman
> 502 299-2565
> [log in to unmask]
> www.dangediman.com <http://www.dangediman.com/>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>



-- 
Ellis
[log in to unmask]
818-846-5525

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager