LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2018

ARSCLIST September 2018

Subject:

Normalization Question

From:

David Seubert <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 21 Sep 2018 09:39:15 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (21 lines)

UCSB is digitizing Edison Diamond Discs from the teens and 1920s and
putting them online in DAHR. We are normalizing access files using EBU
R-128 to -16 LUFS. When we do this manually in Wavelab it sounds great.
When we batch process using ffmpeg (double pass), files with certain noise
profiles come out sounding terrible, full of volume pumping. RMS
normalization in ffmpeg works fine. Questions are, does EBU R-128 not work
well with noisy content? Why does the normalizer in Wavelab work so much
better than ffmpeg? And finally, is there any reason not to just use RMS
normalization? Our workflow is automated, so using Wavelab isn't an option.


I can probably share files if anybody want to hear.


Thanks,


David Seubert

UCSB

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager