On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 18:34, Denenberg, Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Andy Mabbett
> > Is the omission of the 'Acknowledgements' section from the earlier draft
> > deliberate?
> Acknowledgement is complicated, the list has not been updated since 2012 and there have been additional contributors since then. But I've added the original list, with a qualifying note.
Thank you. Perhaps the same should be done with "References", also?