Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:26 AM Discussion of the Developing Date/Time Standards [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christoph Päper wrote:
> "Denenberg, Ray" <[log in to unmask]>:
> >The draft specification from 2012 has therefore been superseded and a
> >revised EDTF
> >Specification<http://www.loc.gov/standards/datetime/edtf.html> based on
> >the revised 8601 is now available.
> Itʼs good to know that EDTF remains closely aligned with the most recent edition of
> ISO 8601 and there wonʼt be two similar but slightly different standards.
> However, I _really_ wished the Seasons codes would have been revised before itʼs
> finally too late.
Nice work, thank you!
Are there any plans to register datatypes for EDTF datestrings in order to transport those in e. g. RDF (à la "2001-34"^^edtf:seasonCode)?