LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2019

ARSCLIST January 2019

Subject:

Looking for Partner Archive/Library

From:

Hugh Paterson III <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:34:09 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

Greetings,

I am in a project where we are looking to use Machine Learning to enhance
the bibliographic records of language resources (materials about languages,
or materials in languages, or materials by ethnolinguistic minority
language communities).

Our project particularly is looking at minority languages (language
communities can be from anywhere in the world, but we are primed for
African language communities).

"What do we mean by 'enhance'?" we want to increase the specificity of the
language identified in the recording — in print media this might be a
subject term. Some of you might be familiar with MARC records. MARC records
have long had a special field for notating languages. For example, consider
MARC21 field 041 [1]. The code in this field is often a three letter code
from ISO 639-2 [2]. We are trying to align bibliography records to ISO
639-3 [3] which has several thousand codes rather than the several hundred
in ISO 639-3. For several years now various standards like Dublin Core have
pointed to ISO 639-3 rather than 639-2 [4].

Many institutions don't use field 041, but might have a note field, or the
resource might be labeled with the name of an ethnolinguistic community in
the title or use Library of Congress Subject Headings instead to identify
the language.

Updating catalogue records which are often manually produced is likely
never to happen without a high degree of accuracy and a high degree of
automation.

As a linguist I have previously worked at an archive which specialized in
minority language holdings both print and audio. I know that special
collections can vary widely in their description level and consistency. My
partner in this project is a Data Scientist who specializes in Machine
Learning.

Our project was initially looking to work with bibliographic records for
print media. Several university library institutions turned down our offer
because it would mean sharing their holdings records, which they either
have a policy of not doing, or they have a commitment to an OCLC [5] record
at a library consortium level [9] — we are willing to work with a
consortium too. (For those of you in libraries and archives please help me
understand the politics here, because I would have thought that sharing
bibliographic records is what library search engines/web sites were for,
and that better visibility would increase the social value of holdings). At
any rate, we are now open to the option of working with records of both
print media and audio media.

Academically, we are not the first in this field. Our work builds upon the
ground breaking work by Bird & Simons [6] and Hirt et al. [10]. And the
metadata standard that a community of archivists and linguists agreed upon
[7] which has been adopted by at least 30 archives with language resource
collections. These institutions aggregate their open metadata and internet
users can search by language online [8]. By focusing on print media
collections we were hoping to extend the kinds of materials in the
aggregator. I know there is still room for more audio materials records to
be included as I have identified at least 30 archives with audio language
resources which are not participating in OLAC.

We are looking at machine learning and named entity extraction for
automating identification of subject languages for published works, this is
in contrast to what Hirt et al. in [10] attempt, where they extract certain
fields from the MARC records. We are hoping to collect a few catalogs in
MARC XML formats. To that extent we are interested in finding a
collaborating researcher at an institution which is willing to share their
holdings records.

We are aware that this is a pretty big ask and maybe a bit unusual, though
Harvard does freely share their holdings records [11].

We would like to get several large library catalogs to train and test our
Machine Learning Models.

Interested parties can contact me directly.

thank you,
all the best,

[1]: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd041.html
[2]: https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
[3]: https://iso639-3.sil.org
[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639-3#Usage
[5]: https://www.oclc.org/en/home.html
[6]: Bird, Steven & Gary Simons. 2003. Extending Dublin Core Metadata to
Support the Description and Discovery of Language Resources. Computers and
the Humanities Vol. 37, No. 4: 375-388.
[7]: http://www.language-archives.org/OLAC/metadata.html
[8]: http://search.language-archives.org/index.html
[9]: https://www.orbiscascade.org
[10] Christopher Hirt, Gary Simons, and Joan Spanne. "Building a
MARC-to-OLAC Crosswalk: Repurposing Library Catalog Data for the Language
Resources Community", 08/01/2010-07/31/2011,  2009, "Proceedings of the
Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, page 393".
https://scholars.sil.org/sites/scholars/files/gary_f_simons/poster/marc-to-olac.pdf
[11]
https://library.harvard.edu/services-tools/harvard-library-apis-datasets

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager